My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN062679
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
CCMIN062679
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:48:37 AM
Creation date
11/12/1999 11:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by recipients of~grant funds. Mr. Brown stated that data used was from the Census <br />reports that the City paid for, and that other City data was also used. He addressed <br />the problem of satisfying the State and Federal governments concerning their thoughts <br />that Pleasanton is using a bad rate structure and the one proposed would now make <br />it equitable for obtaining the grants. Mayor Brandes spoke to the policy of granting <br />senior citizens a discount concerning their utility bills and that sewer charges <br />should fall into this same category. Mr. Brown explained water, garbage, and sewers <br />are discounted for senior citizens. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Mrs. Betty Rider, 4393 Mirador Drive, spoke challenging that single-family resi- <br />dences use twice as much sewer service as multi-unit families, and star this would <br />be discrimination. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ken Devore, 3543 Yellowstone Court, addressed Mr. Lawson and confirmed how <br />Mr. Lawson arrived at his figures. Mr. Lawson confirmed that Mr. Devore understood <br />his calculations but stated that same formula could not be applied to industrial <br />users. Mr. Lawson explained this matter. Councilmember Butler stated that sprink- <br />ling does not go into the sewers. Councilmember Mercer cited an example, Tenneco. <br /> <br /> Mr. Walker explained the overall rate increase is 10% from all uses. Mayor <br />Brandes confirmed that the increase would hold for 2+ years and that single-family <br />residences would be increased from $15.60 to $17.10, and that multiples would be <br />decreased from $15.60 to $9.60. Mr. Walker stated that the total amount of revenue <br />comes to within $1,000.00. <br /> <br /> Mr. DeWitt Wilson. 1784 Beachwood, spoke to single-families in Pleasanton using <br />280 gallons per day while Union City uses 220 gallons per day in single-family <br />homes. He stated he did not agree with any of the report offered. Mr. Lawson <br />explained it relates to the income of a community, age of community, etc. He <br />stated Antioch and Pittsburg vary from 10-15/day and they are neighboring communi- <br />ties. He stated that 80 gallons per capita per day is used in Stockton but 70 gal- <br />lons per day per capita is what is usually seen; the poorer the community the <br />higher the usage. Councilmember Wood stated he thought there was a fairer distri- <br />bution of charges than that proposed. Mr. Lawson again explained the equity. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brown stated that as LAVWMA approached the 80% expenditure level and that <br />before the 80% can be paid we have to come up with a recognized equitable system <br />before they can be paid and the City of Pleasanton does not have an equitable policy <br />according to the State. He stated the consequences are very severe if this distri- <br />bution is not approved. He added that this is the first time the City has had to <br />meet the criteria of the State and that a revenue program had to be approved. He <br />stated in answer to Councilmember Butler's statement that based on hard data, census <br />material which the State and Federal governments would accept, the rates proposed <br />are equitable. <br /> <br /> Mr. William Kovac, 3124 Weymouth Court, spoke stating he concurred with the <br />previous speaker and felt that the rates proposed are discriminating and stated <br />that he does not want to subsidize commercial or multiples. Mr. Brown stated that <br />the rate structure proposed does not have one group subsidizing the other; there <br />is no relationship. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony on the 1979-80 Operating Budget and Capital <br />Improvement'Program, Amendments to 1978-79 Budget and Capital Improvement Program, <br />and Changes to Sewer Rates, Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing closed on <br />these items. <br /> <br /> 6. 6/26/79 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.