CCMIN062679 - Laserfiche WebLink

After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that Ordinance No. 893, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, establishing speed limits as follows: 1. Foothill Road - 1-580 to Stoneridge Drive 45 mph (To become effective upon annexation) 2. Foothill Road - Highland Oaks Drive north to City Limit 45 mph 3. Hopyard Road - West Las Positas to Stoneridge 45 mph 4. Pico Avenue - Kottinger to Vineyard 30 mph 5. Santa Rita Road - }~in to Black 25 mph 6. Santa Rita Road - Black to Mohr 35 mph 7. Santa Rita Road - Old Santa Rita to 1-580 50 mph 8. Stoneridge Drive - Foothill to Springdale 40 mph 9. Sunol Boulevard - First to Mission 35 mph 10. Valley Avenue - Santa Rita to Busch 45 mph 11. West Las Positas - Foothill to Muirwood 40 mph 12. West Las Positas - Dorman to Payne 35 mph be introduced. The roll call vo'te was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Matters for the Information of the Council Mr. Brown stated there would be an Executive Session at the conclusion of this meeting. Extension of A~reement to Provide Fire Protection Service to Unincorporated Areas Mr. Brown presented the report of the Assistant to the City Manager-Walker, dated June 14, 1979, regarding this matter. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- member Mercer, that Resolution No. 79-109, approving the Modification of Contract extending the existing agreement between the City and the County for fire service to the Remen Tract, Castle~ood, Happy Valley and Stanley Boulevard areas until June 30, 1980, for a minimum payment of $54,077.00, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution Establishing Fee for TempQrary Parking Lot Permits Mr. Brown presented his report dated June 19, 1979, regarding this matter. Councilmember Wood spoke to a flat fee should be based on the size of the parking lot and stated that even City building permits take this into considera- tion. He stated he could not see the reason why a 25 car parking lot has to pay the same as a 100 car parking lot and indicated a sliding scale of 0 to 25 cars at one rate, 26 to another amount at another rate, etc. He stated he felt that non-profit organizations should not have to pay any fee. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that Resolution No. 79-110, amending Resolution }Io. 77-123 (Establish- ing Fees and Charges for Various Municipal Services of the City of Pleasanton) by adding subparagraph 23 to Section II(C) of Exhibit A, relating to fees for temporary parking permits, be adopted. 13. 6/26/79