CCMIN010979 - Laserfiche WebLink

have any po.t.ential.. significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial. StUdy. is avail- able for review at the Planning Department,..2~0 Bernal Avenue,..~leasa~t0n, Cal- ifornia. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the planning . staff prior to the above meeting date, or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meeting (Continued Open from 12-19-78) Mr. Harris presented his report dated January 3, 1979, regarding this matter. He also presented two written communications; one from Kolln Fmrdware, Inc., signed by J. E. Kolln and W. E. Lutz, in favor of the Ordinance; and one from Edith Trimingham, 493 St. John Street, opposing the ordinance and requesting that her property be removed from the list of properties for inclusion in the H-O District. Mr. Harris explained that the proposed Ordinance was for the purpose of creating the H-O District and that specific structures for inclu- sion in this ordinance would be considered at subsequent public hearings. Considerable Council discussion ensued regarding the purpose and aims of the newly proposed ordinance. Mayor Mercer stated this matter was initiated by a'previous City Council when it was felt that a certain historical structure was in danger of possible alteration. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open. No one in the audience spoke in favor of the application. The following persons spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance: Jim Trinimgham, 4419 Second Street Betty Rider, 4393 Mirador Drive John Edmands, 4672 Second Street Callie Heinbaugh, 4590 Mohr Avenue There being no further public testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and - seconded by Councilmember Butler, that the application of the City to amend Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton by adding Article 33, H-O (Historic Overlay) District, be denied. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Butler, Kephart, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSE~NT: None it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that the existing H-O Ordinance be reconsidered by the City Council. After further discussion, Councilmember Wood withdrew his motion and Councilmember Brandes withdrew his second. It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that Council initiate an ordinance repealing the existing H-O ordinance. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Brandes, Butler, Kephart, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSEnt: None 4. 1/9/79