CCMIN102379 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Douglass rebutted the concerns of the surrounding homeowners. He suggested amendments to the conditions recommended by Mrs. Severin as follows: (1) that two- story houses be allowed on 41 ft. differential levels only, to protect the views; (2) that Monterey Pines be allowed to be planted; (3) that the fence along Pico be of masonry block with landscaping pockets; (4) design and construction of Pico as approved by City staff; and (5) No fence in the middle of the open space. Mayor Brandes asked Mr. Douglass if he had any objections to any other conditions recommended by Mrs. Severin. Mr. Douglass replied he did not. Council discussion regarding the width and design of Pico Avenue ensued. Mr. Campbell recommended it not be less than 84 feet wide and he would prefer that it be 104 feet wide with a median. There being no further testimony Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Resolution No. 79-200, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a mitigated Negative Declaration is appro- priate to-rezone a 32 acre site located between Pleasanton School Upper Playfield and Miradot Drive immediately southerly of the residences bordering Angela Street, from the A (Agricultural) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) District and for development plan approval for a 79 lot, single-family residential subdivision, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, and Mayor Brandes NOES: Councilman Wood ABSENT: None Council reviewed each condition and amended various ones, which are incorporated in final form in the ordinance below. Mayor Brandes stated he would be voting in opposition to this application because he did not feel this development would have enough large type homes as are needed in Pleasanton; that this is a unique piece of property and should have a more innovative designed project. I~ was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Ordinance No. 914, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of Centex Homes to fezone a 32 acre site located between Pleasanton School Upper Playfield and Mirador Drive immediately southerly of the residences bordering Angela Street, from the A (Agricultural) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) District and for development plan approval for a 79 lot, single-family residential subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the development be substantially as shown on the development plan, Exhibit A, on file with the Planning Division. 2. That a detailed landscape plan of all areas to be landscaped by the developer be submitted to the Planning staff for approval prior to consideration of a tentative map on the subject property. 3. That the minimum depth of level back yard area for any lot be 20 ft. 8, 10/23/79