CCMIN072479 - Laserfiche WebLink

and that the City Council had indicated such a center was acceptable. After dis- cussion, Council instructed staff to research the background information on this matter and Council's previous action, and report back on this issue. Mayor Brandes stated he felt City Council meetingswere more appropriate being held in the Cultural Arts Center. Also in this regard, he suggested the City re- locate the Vizzolini house on St. Mary Street to a location acceptable for City use. He stated that perhaps some of the activities currently being conducted at the Cultural Arts Center could be carried on in the Vizzolini house to allow Council and Commissions use of the Cultural Arts Center, Councilmember Butler stated he favored use of the Fairgrounds Cafeteria for conduct of Council meetings as it allowed more room for people to attend. After discussion, Council instructed staff to prepare a report regarding possible relocation and uses of the City owned Vizzolini house on St. Mary Street, and the feasibility of using the Cultural Arts Center for Council and Commissions meetings. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Councilmember Kephart reported on the LAVWMAmeeting of July 11, 1979, stating that with regard to the proposed Reclamation Study, DSRSD requested this matter be postponed until their Board had sufficient time to study the proposal. Representa- tives of the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton were in favor of conducting the Reclamation Study for Phase II of the LAVI~ pipeline. Councilmember Kephart ad- vised that since the LAVWMAmeeting on July 11, 1979, that DSRSD had taken a posi- tion against the study. LAVWMA bylaws require a unanimous vote for passage of any proposals. Mr. Brown advised that the City of Livermore instructed their represen- tatives to move to change the voting requirements of the LAVWMA bylaws. After dis- cussion, it was moved by Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that the City Council instruct its representatives to the LAVWMA Board to move to change the voting requirements of the LAVWMA bylaws that a unanimous vote not be required, to encourage DSRSD to participate in the Reclamation Study for Phase II of the LAVWMA project, and if they did not participate the City of Pleasanton would pay its proportionate share of costs with the City of Livermore to conduct the Reclama- tion Study. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Wood Councilmember Kephart reported on a meeting with several Recreational Vehicle owners, stating that a citizens committee is being formed to draft proposals for Council consideration regarding the parking problems related to recreational vehicles. MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC No one in the audience addressed the Chair. PUBLIC HEARINGS Application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone a 37 acre area located alon~... Stan!~y Boulevard~ between Main Street and First Street-Stanley Boulevard road- way to the R-1-20~O00.(SinSle-Famil7 Residential) District (~eneral~y the western- most 17.5 acres) and the C-S (Service Commercial) District (general.ly the eastern 19.5 acres) or any other zonin~ district consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial St~.l. of the potential environmental impacts of the pro~ect~ th.~.Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that .t_heproposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. 3. 7/24/79