My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN072479
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
CCMIN072479
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:48:37 AM
Creation date
11/11/1999 12:33:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This Initial Study is available for review at the Planning. Division~ 200 Bernal <br />Avenue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the <br />Plannin~ staff prior to the above meeting date~ or directly to the City Council <br />at the above noticed meeting <br />(Continued Open from 7-10-79) <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report dated July 12, 1979, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes expressed concern regarding the proposed R-1-20,O00 zoning and <br />asked if the affected property owners were fully aware of this zoning classifica- <br />tion. Mr. Harris stated he had met with the property owners and explained the <br />various zoning categories but did not go into the specifics of lot splits. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing open on the application and the <br />Negative Declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Earl Augusta, 3963 Stanley Boulevard, reviewed the background information <br />relating to his property, stating that it had been determined that the property <br />would require a General Plan amendment before prezoning could be accomplished. He <br />stated that for reasons of his own and in all fairness any designation on the <br />Augusta property other than Residential would be unacceptable. Mr. Augusta stated <br />he felt all fees should be waived for the General Plan amendment regarding this <br />property since this annexation had been initiated by the City. Mr. Augusta stated <br />he felt a written commitment by the City to the property owners was imperative to <br />assure the people of their rights under annexation. <br /> <br /> Council and staff discussion ensued regarding municipal improvements and who <br />is responsible for costs involved. Mr. Campbell advised it had been the policy <br />of past City Councils that there was no obligation on the part of property owners <br />until they redevelop, and that improvements are done when it is feasible in the <br />area unless the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood is affected. <br /> <br /> After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and <br />seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that the City Council reaffirm its current <br />policy that it is not the Cityvs intent to change the life style of the property <br />owners in annexation proceedings, and that there is no obligation on the part of <br />the property owners to pay for municipal improvements until such time as they <br />redevelop and it is feasible or unless the health, safety and welfare of the <br />neighborhood is affected. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Wood <br /> <br /> Mr. Frank Auf der Maur, 599 Pico Avenue, stated he was opposed to the R-i-20,000 <br />zoning because he felt it was not compatible with the adjacent R-1-6500 zoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Maurice Jones, 4023 Stanley Boulevard, stated he favored R-i-20,000 zoning. <br />He stated that he had talked to all of the property owners in the area except two, <br />and all would like to keep the area as it is now. <br /> <br /> Mr. Joe Madden, 3851 Vineyard Avenue, stated that with respect to his parcel <br />he would request that it be prezoned Agricultural. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes asked if any affected property owners in the audience had any <br />questions regarding the proposed R-i-20,000 zoning. No one spoke. <br /> <br /> Council reaffirmed to Mr. Augusta that his property would be zoned Residential <br />following the General Plan amendment proceedings. <br /> <br /> 4. 7/24/79 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.