CCMIN101480 - Laserfiche WebLink

245 It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 80-259, after establishing the findings that the Environmental Impact Report prepared is complete, sufficient, and acceptable for the project proposed, and that the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed ordinance has been com- pleted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and State and City guidelines, approving the Environmental Impact Report prepared and filed under proposal of City ordinance regulating the use of City streets for gravel trucks, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None After discussion, Mayor Mercer scheduled the public hearing to consider the alternate ordinance which would ban all commercial traffic over 16,000 pounds on First Street and Sunol Boulevard, on December 22, 1980, 8:00 P.M., at the Fair- grounds Cafeteria. ~yor Mercer thanked the gravel companies and Supervisor Raymond for their cooperation in recent meetings in trying to resolve this matter. Councilmember Mohr expressed appreciation to all the concerned people who took time to come to this meeting and express their thoughts. Mayor Mercer recessed the meeting at 8:50 P.M. Mayor Mercer reconvened the meeting at 9:00 P.M. Application of the City Council for a general plan amendment to chan~e the land use designation of 18 separate sites and to change the Circulation Element to show an extension of Railroad Avenue On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environm.enta! impacts of the p.ro3ect, the Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential siSnificant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be .prepared. This Initi~ Study. is available for review at the Plannit8 Division~ 200 Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Plannin8 staff prior to the above meeting date~ or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meetin5 ~.Ir. Harris presented his report dated October 7, 1980, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the Negative Declaration. Mr. Roger Manning, 1078 Vintner Way, stated he favored changing the 9.8 acre parcel immediately south of Foothill High School from Public and Institutional to Low Density Residential, as recommended by Planning Commission. Mrs. Pat Griffin, 1055 Kottinger Drive, stated she was opposed to changing the approximately 1.1 acre site located between the extension of Pico Avenue and St. Augustine's Catholic Church from Medium Density Residential to High Density Resi- dential. She stated she lived immediately below this property, and was concerned that two-story structures would be erected, which would adversely impact her privacy. She presented a petition signed by 14 residents which read as follows: "We, the under-signed, are against the suggested amendment to the General Plan that would change the zoning on a parcel of land behind St. Augustine's Church, to High Density Residential". 6. 10/14/80