My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101480
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CCMIN101480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:52 AM
Creation date
11/11/1999 12:16:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~iser had offered the use of their north and west bound lanes to Lone Star but <br />that Lone Star had refused the offer because of possible adverse consideration by <br />the Federal Land and Trust laws. He stated that a trust fund could be established <br />by the City to maintain E1 Charro Road, and he felt that Kaiser and the other <br />gravel companies should each contribute $50,000 per year to this fund. Mr. Heck <br />thanked the Mayor, Supervisor Raymond, and other members of the Committee for their <br />efforts in trying to resolve this problem. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bill Downing, representing Rhodes Jamieson Company, stated this firm is in <br />concurrence with Kaiser's presentation. He stated that Rhodes Jamieson o~ns a <br />small section of E1 Charro Road, and they are willing to permit Lone Star to use <br />that road based on some kind of pro-rata for maintenance, such as presented by <br />Kaiser. Mr. Downing urged the City to complete the Bernal Avenue Extension and <br />stated that the gravel companies would contribute the materials at cost. He <br />requested Council to consider the possibility of rezoning the eastern side of <br />First Street to business office and commercial. He also suggested a payment to <br />the City on a per ton basis on a recurring basis of 2-2½¢ per ton. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tony deMaria, Attorney representing Lone Star Industries, stated that <br />problems had developed in the negotiations between Lone Star and its competitors <br />with anti-trust problems. He stated that Lone Star objects to the passage of the <br />weight limitation ordinance and feel that it is unconstitutional. <br /> <br /> The City Attorney presented his report (SR 80:292) dated 10-8-80, regarding <br />this matter. He stated that before the Council tonight is a resolution certifying <br />the Environmental Impact Report and the draft ordinance introduced on June 12, <br />1979. Following the public hearing if the Council chooses Mr. Levine recommended <br />adopting the resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report. Mr. Levine <br />advised that staff would like to make a proposed modification the the draft ordi- <br />nance. The proposed ordinance studied by this Environmental Impact Report would <br />have the effect of banning two of the three gravel companies operating east of the <br />City from the First Street-Sunol Boulevard corridor. The staff's initial informa- <br />tion indicated this would have left approximately 30% of the traffic, the amount <br />staff believed was generated by Lone Star on First Street. The information sub- <br />mitted by the gravel companies since that time indicates that in fact nearly 57% <br />of the traffic last year was generated by Lone Star. Thus, the environmental bene- <br />fits of the proposed ordinance are far more limited than originally believed. While <br />reduction of the traffic by 43% would in fact decrease the noise, pollution, and <br />safety hazard 8f truck traffic, according to the draft Environmental Impact Report <br />it would not do so in a manner which would be considered significantly beneficial. <br />The underlying theory of the proposed ordinance was that Kaiser and Rhodes and <br />Jamieson would be willing to make E1 Charro Road available to Lone Star if Lone <br />Star were given a permit to use First Street; and the ordinance was drafted in a <br />manner that would allow the City of bar Lone Star if an alternate route were made <br />available to them by Kaiser and Rhodes & Jamieson. In view of the inability of <br />the gravel companies to come up with a suitable alternative plan during the last <br />sixty days of negotiations with the City, and in view of the fact that Lone Star <br />has a larger portion of the traffic on First Street than previously believed, the <br />City staff would make the following recommendation: That the Council not take <br />action on the proposed ordinance tonight, but instead instruct the staff to prepare <br />an alternate ordinance which would ban all commercial traffic over 16,000 pounds <br />from First Street and Sunol Boulevard eliminating the special permit for Lone Star. <br />In order to consider such an ordinance, the City must again give sixty days notice <br />pursuant to the Vehicle Code. A public hearing could be held at any time after <br />December 19, 1980. Mr. Levine recommended that the Council call such a hearing <br />and instruct staff to prepare an ordinance described above to the end that the City <br />would prohibit all truck traffic on First Street. <br /> <br /> 4. 10/14/80 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.