CCMIN052780 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilmember good, and seconded by Councilmember'Mohr, that Ordinance No. 933, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of Amador Valley Investors to fezone from the R-1-6500 (Single-Family Residential) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) District and development plan approval for a 34-1ot, single-family residential subdivision proposed to be built on an approximately 9 acre parcel located on the south side of Fairlands Drive opposite its intersection with Brockton Drive and amending the Zon- ing Map of the City of Pleasanton accordingly, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, good, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None SPECIAL REPORTS ~eport on Condominium Conversions (Continued from. 4-22-'80 and 5-13-80) Mr. Levine presented his report dated April 17, 1980, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer stated that comments would be allowed from the audience on this item, and that if the ordinance is introduced it will be sent to the Southern Alameda County Board of Realtors for their review before it is adopted. Mr. Mike Harris, President of the Southern Alameda County Board of Realtors, spoke in opposition to the proposed condominium ordinance, stating that it will not increase rental stock on the market. He cited the real problem as being lack of "affordable housing". He stated that most apartment owners in Pleasanton are local residents, not speculators, and he did not feel this ordinance was necessary in Pleasanton. Mr. Harris urged Council to analyze the problem before adopting this ordinance. ~'. The City Attorney suggested minor language changes in the ordinance by changing the word "condominium" to "projects with individually-owned units", and adding "stock cooperatives" as condominiums subject to regulation. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that Ordinance No. 936, to be read by title only and waivin~ further read- ing thereof, regulating condominium conversions in the City of Pleasanton, and including a statement that excess rental allocation numbers will not be carried forward at the end of the year if not used, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution Ordering the Annexation of Annexation No. 77 (Pestana) (Continued from 4-22-80 and 5-13-80) Councilmember Mohr stated that she had requested discussion on this item because she was not a member of the Council when the matter was initially processed. She advised it was her feeling that there is adequate land within the City zoned for residential and she is reluctant to add property for residential use only when no municipal services can be provided. She added that this could set a precedent. Councilmember Butler stated these concerns were addressed and considered at the time the application came before the City and that the Council took action to ret quest LAFCO to annex this property. Councilmember Butler stated he did not feel this decision should be reversed now. 7. 5/27/80