Laserfiche WebLink
The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mobr, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Kephart and Wood <br /> <br />Adop.tion of Ordinance No..931, to amend Section 2-5.35 of Article 3, Chapter 2, <br />Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton to allow connnercial and <br />industrial subdivisionswithout re~ard to the minimum site requirements after a <br />project has been built. Minor changes to other sections would be made to conform <br />to the. purposes and intent of this revision <br /> (Introduced 3-25-80, 4-Ayes, 1-Absent) .. <br /> <br />Report and Draft Ordinance on Commercial Subdivisions not yet constructed <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 931 was introduced on March 25, 1980, <br />by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent. <br /> <br /> Mr. Levine presented his report dated April 16, 1980, regarding amendment to <br />the Ordinance Code permitting subdivisions of certain industrial and commercial <br />projects. <br /> <br /> Mr. RonAxcher, Civil Engineer, 205Main Street, urged approval of the original <br />ordinance which included industrial and commercial development yet to be constructed. <br /> <br /> After discussion, and explanation by the City Attorney, Council decided to in- <br />clude non-built as well as constructed shoppings centers under the purview of the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that <br />Ordinance No. 931, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, <br />amending'Section 2-5.35 (Basic Requirements for all Districts) of Article 3, Chapter <br />2, and Section 2-3.38 (Subdivision Standards - Requirements) of Article 7, Chapter <br />1, of Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton, including projects <br />that have been built and/or approved for building, be re-introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Kephart and Wood <br /> <br />SPECIAL REPORTS <br />Communication from Mental Health Association of Alameda...~.oun.ty <br /> Mrs. Elva Cooper, representing the Valley Mental Health Facility, presented <br />background information related to this program and emphasized the need for such <br />a clinic in the Valley. She stated the program was in danger of losing County <br />funds for its operation, and she urged Council to support allocation of money to <br />support the facility located on Hopyard Road. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Council- <br />member Butler, that Resolution No. 80-106, strongly supporting the continuation of <br />funds by Alameda County to operate the Valley'Mental Health Facility on Hopyard <br />Road, be adopted. <br />The roll c~ll vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Kephart and Wood <br /> <br /> 7. 4/22/80 <br /> <br /> <br />