CCMIN042280 - Laserfiche WebLink

1Sl the proposed annexation territory a chance to be heard. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open. No one in the audience spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing continued open to the meeting of May 13, 1980, 8:00 P.M., Fairgrounds Cafeteria, and stated that it should be pointed out to the protestors that only written protest will carry any weight in the final decision, and these written protests should be received before that date. He added that oral protests would also be received at the meeting of May 13, 1980. Application of Amador Valley Investors to fezone from the R-1-6500 (Single-Family Residential) DiStrict to the PUD (Planned Unit Develo'~ent) D'istrict and develOp- ment plan approval for a 34-1ot, single-family residential subdivision proposed, to be'built o~.~n approx~,tely 9 acre parcel located on the south side of Fair~ lands Drive opposite its intersection with Brockton Drive On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project, .the Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental imp.act report need not be prepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Planning Division, 200 Bernal Avenue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision max be directed to either the Planning staff prior to the above meeting. date~ Or directly to the.pi~y Council at the above noticed meeting Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item and continued to the meeting of May 13, 1980, 8:00 P.M., Fairgrounds Cafeteria, at the request of the applicant. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Adoption of Ordinance No...9~0, approving the application of the Plannin~ Commission to rezone those sites located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue which are fully developed as apartment projects from the RM-400Q (Multiple Residential~ 11 units per acre) DistriCt to those zonin~ districts under which the sites were developed, including the following locations: 3767 Vineyard Avenues Wisteria Lane Apartments.- RM-4000 to RM-2500; 3819 Vineyard Avenue, Pleasanton Greens Apartments - RM-4000 to RM-2500} 3955 Vineyard Avenue, Del ArroyO Apartments - RM-4000 to PUD High Density Residential (23 to 25 units per acre); 4095 Vineyard Avenue~ Vintage Townhouse - RM-4000 to RM-1500~ 3969 V. ineyard Avenue~ Del Arroyo Apartments - RM-4000 to RM-2500 (Introduced 3-25T.80, 4-Ayes~ 1-Absent) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 930 was introduced on March 25, 1980, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and' seconded by Mayor Mercer, that Ordi- nance No. 930, approving the application of the Planning Commission to fezone those sites located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue which are fully developed as apart- ment projects from the RM-4000 (Multiple Residential, 11 units per acre) District to those zoning districts under which the sites were developed, including the following locations: 3767 Vineyard Avenue, Wisteria Lane Apartments - RM-4000 to RM-2500; 3819 Vineyard Avenue, Pleasanton Greens Apartments - RM-4000 to RM-2500; 3955 Vineyard Avenue, Del Arroyo Apartments - RM-4000 to PUD High Density Residential (23 to 25 units per acre); 4095 Vineyard Avenue, Vintage Townhouse - RM-4000 to RM-1500; 3969 Vineyard Avenue, Del Arroyo Apartments - RM-4000 to RM-2500 (Zoning Unit Map ~206), be adopted. 6. 4/22/S0