CCMIN010880 - Laserfiche WebLink

After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Council- member Kephart, that Resolution No. 80-11, denying the appeal of Richard Conklin from the denial of a home occupation permit at 6268 Robin Court for a firearm ammu- nition reloading service based upon the determination of the Building Official that such use of a residence would be in violation of the provisions of the Uniform Build- ing and Fire Codes as incorporated in Chapter 3, Title II, and Chapter 1, Title IV, respectively, of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Application of John and Joan Caroline to rezone the 69 acres located on the south side of Valley Avenue and immediately east. erly of the residences along KQlln Street from the IiP ~PUbliC and Institutional) District to the PUD-Industrial (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) District and for develop.ment plan approval for a business/industrial park complex. An environmental impact report (EIR) will also be considered Mr. Harris presented his staff report dated January 2, 1980, regarding this matter. b~yor Brandes declared the public hearing open on the application and the EIR. Mr. John Caroline, 4487 Pleasanton Avenue, applicant, presented composite pictures showing the proposed commercial development. He stated he concurred with the conditions established by the Planning Commission and with the Environ- mental Impact Report. He stated he felt the traffic figures in the EIR were high and he presented graphs completed by a traffic engineer showing lower truck and vehicle traffic counts which he felt were more reasonable. Councilmember Mercer asked Mr. Caroline how the restriction to only allow 2- axle trucks into the development would relate to his businesses. Mr. Caroline stated his tenants feel they can comply with this condition without any problems. Mr. Lars Jotten, 1265 Kolln Street, representing the residents on Kolln Street, stated the majority of homeowners were in general agreement with the proposed plans and conditions as outlined in the staff report. However, this group would like to have the recreation facility moved from the northwest corner to the northeast corner of the development. Mr. Jotten stated the residents were also concerned about the allowable business hours of the park complex and suggested the hours be restricted to 7:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m. The following persons spoke in opposition to this item: Mr. Robert Pearson, 3590 Churchill Court, addressed the following three areas of concern: (1) land use; (2) traffic; and (3) sewerage capacity. He elaborated extensively on each item stating he felt it was imperative to know what uses were proposed for the industrial park before any approvals were given in order to deter- mine if the uses were compatible with the neighborhood. He added the uses would also determine whether or not the development would be in conformance with the General Plan. Mr. Pearson stated he disagreed with the traffic figures presented by Mr. Caroline. He expressed concern regarding the problem of access and stated he also felt no approvals should be given until such time as E1 Charro Road is open for public use. Mr. Pearson presented a petition signed by 43 residents which read as follows: 5. 1/8/8o