CCMIN010880 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that Resolution No. 80-14, after review of the bids, awarding the contract for the construction of Handicap Ramp for the Veterans Memorial Building to Ambo Concrete Company, Inc., in the amount of $5,450.00, that any necessary additional funds that cannot be obtained through H&CD funds be allocated from the Capital Improve- ment Fund, authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute the contract, and allowing Robles Construction Company to withdraw its mistaken low bid, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Matters for the Information of the Council Mr. Walker stated that the City has received notice from the State Controller's office that the City will receive an additional $91,000.00 in revenue, and that this will help to offset AB-8. Mr. Brown presented the City Council Agenda Planning Report for January, February, and March for the information of the Council. Mr. Brown presented the attendance report of the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, and Human Services Commission for the period July 1, 1979/ December 31, 1979. Councilmember Wood requested that a letter of appreciation be sent to those Commissioners with perfect attendance. REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY On-Street Recreation Vehicle Parkins Limitationsl Ballot Measure Mr. Levine presented his report dated January 3, 1980, regarding this matter. Councilmember Kephart stated he felt this is an important issue that should be dealt with other than citizen complaint form, and that the residents of Pleasanton should have the opportunity to decide the matter. Councilmember Butler stated he felt this is a decision that should be made by Council rather than the voters. Councilmember Wood stated he did not think this matter was a significant pro- blem and could be controlled by present ordinances and codes. Mayor Brandes stated that many people do not want to be involved in complaints, and an ordinance such as this would give the City a more effective tool to control recreational vehicle parking and eliminate the complaint form of enforcement. Mr. Ken DeVote, 3543 Yellowstone Court, stated he was opposed to the proposed ordinance and felt that the present ordinance and codes are sufficient to enforce and control problems. He cited figures in the staff report revealing a very low percentage of RV offenders. He stated he felt other types of vehicles were in greater violation and caused as much or more problems than TV's. Mr. Harold Seller, 4078 West Las Positas, stated he was opposed to the proposed ordinance and felt the 72 hour parking law was sufficient to control any parking problems. He stated there should be a better definition of recreational vehicle. He added that he used his RV to commute to work everyday and did not feel it was fair not to be able to park it at his residence. Mr. Seller stated that this ordinance would also create problems for RV owners loading and unloading before and after trips and could cause a hardship on the life style of the residents of Pleasanton. 12. 1/8/8o