CCMIN051281 - Laserfiche WebLink

prior to the above meetins date~ or directly to the Cit7 Council at the above noticed meetins (Contd. Open from 4-28-81) Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 81:130) dated April 21, 1981, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the continued public hearing open on the application and the Negative Declaration. Mr. Bill Hirst, 147 Bernal Avenue, Attorney representing Hacienda Mobile Home Park, stated he supports the staff report with the exception of the condition that no development take place in any part of the subject area until a road connection has been established between Pico Avenue and Stanley Boulevard. Mr. Hirst advised that his client's five acres within the total 41 acre application would only have 20-30 dwelling units of the type housing needed in Pleasanton; that it will be for adults only thus creaing less traffic and less burden on the school facilities; that less parking space is needed; and that it will not impact Vineyard Avenue because of the Vintage Hills Shopping Center. Mr. Hirst requested Council to obtain additional information if necessary to allow' the subject five acre parcel to develop before the completion of streets improvements - Pico to Stanley. Mr. Cliff Bates, owner of property adjacent to the five acres in question, stated he is in favor of prezontng the 41 acres but opposed to any ~evelopment until the entire area can develop. He stated that development of the five acre site would adversely impact his chicken ranch, and also that his chicken ranch would adversely affect any development adjacent to his property. Ms. Nancy Storch, 3193 Chardonnary Drive, opposed this application Because of its adverse impact on the Vintage Hills area. She felt it would change the aesthetics of Vintage Hills; that it would change the balance of population in the area; and that it is inconsistent with the General Plan. She stated she would like to see a park in the middle of the 41 acres. Mr. Htrst rebutted only by stating that his one concern is for Council to allow development of the subject five acres before completion of Pico Extension to Stanley Boulevard. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the Negative Declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 81-144, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appro- priate to prezone the approximately 41 acre area located on the north side of Vine- yard Avenue ~mmediately east of the Hacienda Mobile Home Park to PUD Medium Density Residential District, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Council- member Butler, that Ordinance No. 976, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton to prezone the approximately 41 acre area located on the north side 7. 5/12/81