CCMIN041481 - Laserfiche WebLink

. 303 outside the restaurant. The site is zoned O/C-O (Office-Civic Overlay) Distr~ct Mayor Mercer declared this item dismissed from the agenda at the written re- quest of the appellant dated April 1, 1981. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Adoption of Ordinance N9. ~70~ approvin~..~he application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone an approximately 43 acre parcel located 830 feet south of the existing City Limit Line between Foothill Road and 1-680 to PUD-Low Density Residential (Intro. 3-24-81, 4-Ayes~.. 1-Absent) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 970 was introduced on March 24, 1981, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. Councilmember Butler stated that he was absent from the meeting when this ordinance was introduced but that he had reviewed it and was prepared to vote on this item. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Ordinance No. 970, approving the application of the City of Pleasan- ton to prezone an approximately 43 acre parcel located 830 feet south of the exist- lug City Limit Line between Foothill Road and 1-680 to PUD-Low Density Residential, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Methods of Abatement of Non-Conforming Uses~ Re: Interstate Laundry Mr. Levine presented his report (SR 81:120) dated April 9, 1981, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer stated he would now accept comments from the audience relative to this item. Ms. Marcia Taylor, 125 Ray Street, spoke in oppositing to having laundries in the C-S District and stated she felt that Interstate Laundry should be relocated as soon as possible for the health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding resi- dential area. Ms. Linda Gavarino, 159 Ray Street, stated she supports the position of the previous speaker, and feels it is hazardous to live with a nuclear laundry in such close proximity. Mr. Jerry Cohen, Science Applications, Inc., 1811 Santa Rita Road, advisor to Interstate Laundry, stated he was concerned about allegations that the laundry posed a health hazard to the surrounding area. He presented a written report re- garding some perspectives on the Interstate Laundry and its Comparative low threat of danger in relation to other types of businesses. He concluded by stating that at no time in the history of the laundry had the license limits ever been exceeded. Councilmember' Butler stated that at the t/me the use permit was heard the most telling argument was that this area is not suitable for an industrial laundry. Councilmember Butler stated he was not sure what better zoning could be used for a commercial laundry, and that if C-S is not appropriate zoning then why did Council expand commercial service in this area. Councilmember Butler advised that Council recently affirmed uses in the C-S District. Councilmember Mohr stated she felt that industrial laundries should be eliminated from C-S zoning, independent from radioactivity - radioactivity is an emotional issue; and that whether or not the concern is valid the neighbors around Interstate 7. 4/10/81