CCMIN041481 - Laserfiche WebLink

301 No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Resolution No. 81-99, after making the following four findings: (1) that because of special circumstances applicable to the property, namely; its location and sur- roundings within a special industrial area devoted to sand and gravel harvesting the strict application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under iden- tical zoning classification; (2) that the granting of the variance will not con- stitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties classified in the same zoning district because of the special nature of the site's vicinity; (3) that the granting of the variance will not be detri- mental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to pro- perties or improvements in the vicinity; and (4) that based upon information pro- vided by the Fire Prevention Division the City will be equipped to provide ade- quate fire protection and adjoining properties will not be adversely affected, approval the appeal by Kaiser Sand and Gravel of a decision of the Board of Adjust- ment, and granting a variance for Kaiser Sand and Gravel to allow the construction of an elevator structure as part of an aspbaltic concrete plant that would exceed 40 feet-in height on its property at 3311 Stanley Boulevard, zoning for the pro- perty is I-G (General Industrial) District, subject to the following conditions: (1) that no structural element of any asphaltic concrete plant subsequently con- structed shall exceed seventy-six (76) feet in height; (2) that this approval does not in any way establish design, location or site development standards for any asphaltic concrete plant development or other improvements of any type on the sub- Ject property; and (3) that the applicant apply for and be granted design review approval prior to application for a building permit, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councft~embers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Review of the draft revised HousinM Element of the General Plan of the City of Pleasanton formulated pUrSuant to State Government Code S.~ction 65302. and State Housin~ Element Guidelin~s... The purpose of the proposed. Housing. Element is to evaluate existing and projected cgmm. unity housing needs and to offer a workable housing program to meet said need . . On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project, the Director of Planning. and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential siBnificant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared~ This Initial Study is available for review at the Planntn.g Division.,.200 Bernal Avenue~ Ple~Santon. Comments on this decision ma7 be directed to either the Planning draff prior to the above meeting date~ or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meeting (Contd. Open from 8-12-80~ 8-26-80~ and 3-10-81) Mayor Mercer declared this item continued Open to the City Council meeting of April 21, 1981, 8:00 P.M., Fairgrounds Cafeteria, at the request of staff. Appeal of Valerie Gannon from an adverse decision of the Board of Adjustment deny- ing an.~pplication for a variance to allow the expansion of seating capacity by approximately 40 seats at the Gay 90's RestaUrant~ 288 Main Stre@t~ without the necessar7 number of on-site p~rkin~ spaces. The additional seatin~ is proposed 6. 4/lO/Sl