CCMIN041481 - Laserfiche WebLink

3O5 Laundry have a genuine fear for their safety and it should be addressed. She added that she would have no fear living next to such a business. Councilmember Mohr stated she felt that radioactive businesses should be considered and possibly not allowed within certain limits of residential zoning. Councilmember Mohr stated she was not ready to initiate any action to force Interstate Laundry to relocate at this time, and felt that C-S zoning uses and radioactive uses should be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. Councilmember Kephart stated that the Council had recently reviewed all uses in each zoning category and that it had been difficult for Council to agree on the particular allowable and permitted uses. He questioned that the Planning Commission had more expertise to recommend changes to the various uses in the zoning categories, and felt that little would be gained from the review. Mayor Mercer stated he questioned the category of industrial laundries in the C-S District and felt all uses should be reviewed at one time in this zoning dis- trict. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, to request a report from the Planning Commission giving recommenda-. tions on which approach would be most beneficial from its point of view for remov- ing the conflict created by the nuclear laundry being adjacent to residential uses including: (1) modification of the zoning code to eliminate industrial laundry from the C-S (Commercial Service) zone; (2) modification of the code to eliminate nuclear related uses from the C-S (Commercial Service) zone; (3) establish minimum distance requirements from residential uses for industrial laundry use, warehouse-type use, and nuclear related. uses; amd (4) review all allowed and permitted uses in the C-S (Commercial Service) zoning district. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Mr. Levine presented his report (SR 81:118) dated April 9, 1981, regarding Elimination of Substantial Non-Conforming Uses. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- member Kephart, instructing the City Attorney to prepare a draft ordinance to initiate an amendment to the zoning code to amend Title II, Chapter 2, Article 23 to add an appropriate provision for abating substantial non-conforming uses. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None SPECIAL REPORTS There were no Special Reports presented at this meeting. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS · Actions Take~ by the Board of Adjustment,_Design Review Board, and. Planning Commission at their meeting of April 8~ 1981 Mr. Harris presented his 'report"YSR 81~i'17) dated April 9, 1981, regarding this matter for the information of the Council. No action was required or taken by Council on this item. 8. 4/lo/81