CCMIN032481 - Laserfiche WebLink

337 It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, to approve the Septic Tank Permit on Foothill Road as requested by Mark Andersen. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Kephart and Wood NOES: Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Hercer ABSENT: Councilmember Butler The City Attorney advised that at the time the lot split is considered, the problem of drainage could be addressed. Further discussion ensued regarding time and cost of a drainage and soils analy- sis. Mr. Hull stated this would require two reports: one on the new lot would take approximately three weeks to complete and the estimated cost would be $1,500.00; the other report would be an indepth soils report and would require approximately six months and he could not estimate the cost at this time. Mayor Mercer stated he is concerned about the drainage problem on the properties below Mr. Andersen. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, to continue the Request for Septic Tank Permit on Foothill Road by Mark Andersen, until the following conditions are met: (1) the County Sanitarian certifies that the existing septic tank on the Andersen property is not failing and is not resulting in effluent running onto the lower property; (2) the County Sanitarian certify that the proposed new septic tank will not produce effluent runoff on any neighboring properties; (3) that surface runoff be studied and mitigation measures be proposed on the proposed lot; and (4) that the existing drainage problems be studied and a report to Council prepared; and that upon com- pletion of these four items, Council will consider jointly the proposed parcel map and septic tank agreement; and at such time, notice to neighboring property owners will again be made. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Butler' Pro.posed Studies Related to the North Pleasanton Industrial and Commercial Develop- ment Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 81:92) dated March 16, 1981, regarding this matter. He advised he had met with various commercial developers this date to dis- cuss the item and that not all developers expressed agreement. Mr. Joe Callahan, representing CPS and Associates, expressed concern about the scope of work and the amount of detail that can be received from such a study. He stated he was not opposed to the hiring of an outside engineer to analyze and make conclusions but felt if there were too many engineers involved it will be difficult to coordinate the work. He advised his firm had already completed extensive studies in the North Pleasanton Area and he questioned what additional information could be received from the proposed studies. Mr. Walker stated he felt this is a good price for the amount of work to be accomplished which is mainly to investigate the possibility of forming an assess- ment district for public improvements in the North Pleasanton Area. Mr. Robert Meyer, representing Meyer Properties, stated he firmly supports the approach, and that he would cooperate with the City in this matter. 11. 3/24/81