My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN031081
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CCMIN031081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:02 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 11:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Mohr requested that a letter be sent to LAFCO supporting Dublin's <br /> incorporation. Councilmember Butler advised that Pleasanton's position on this issue <br /> is that Dublin voters have the right to determine their own destiny on the matter of <br /> incorporation. After discussion, Council instructed staff to write a letter to LAFCO <br /> stating this position. <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> Councilmembers presented various Committee Reports for the information of the <br /> Council. <br /> <br />MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> Mr. Bob Foster, Member of the Murray School District Board, expressed concern <br />regarding the Residential Program as it relates to housing and school district studies, <br />and stated he felt there needed to be an Enviror~ental Impact Report related to this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Application of Michael Harris for rezoning of the .approxim~tely....pne acre site located <br />near the intersection of Santa Rita Road and West Las Positas Blvd., ~ust north of <br />Fire Station No. 3 from the RM-25 (Multi,Family Residential) District to the PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development-HiMh .Density Residential) District or to any 9th~r...zoninM. <br />district consistent with the General Plan, and..for develop~en~ plan approval for a <br />16-unit townhouse residential development 9~ the site <br /> <br />On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the pro, <br />ject~ .the Director of Plannin~' and Community Development has determined that th,~ .... <br />proposed project would not have any potential siMntficant adverse effects on the <br />environment and that an environmental impact .r~port need not be prepared. Tbil~ <br />Initial .Stud~ is available for review at the Planning DiviSion?...200 Bernal AvenueS. <br />Pleasanton. ~on~n. ents .0n this decision may be directed to either the PlanninM staff <br />prior to the above.meet~n~ date, or directly to the city council at the above <br />noticed meetin~ <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 81:70) dated March 3, 1981, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the Negative <br />Declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michael Harris stated the reason for the request is to change the definition <br />of the development to townhouses instead of condomintums in order to be able to get <br />more favorable financing. Mr. Harris advised this isthe same plan as previously <br />approved by Council with only the change in definition. <br /> <br /> No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed <br />on the application and the Negative Declaration. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that <br />Resolution No. 81-64, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental <br />study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as <br />outlined in the City's guidelines and that a Negative Declaration is appropriate for <br />rezonlng of the approximately one acre site located near the intersection of Santa <br />Rita Road and West Las Positas Boulevard, just north of Fire Station No. 3, from the <br />RM-25 (Multi-Family Residential) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development-High <br />Density Residential) District, and for development plan approval for a 16-unit town- <br />house residential development on the site, be adopted. <br /> <br /> 4. 3/10/81 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.