CCMIN122281 - Laserfiche WebLink

· 189 Mr. William Hirst asked if the same low income housing definition would be used as is in the present RAP exemption. The City Attorney advised that HUD guidelines for low income project are currently being used. Council decided to ask the Planning Commission for their view of a low cost housing definition for the exemption. Mr. Parrish stated he is hoping that Planning Commission will have a special meeting between January 5th and January 9th, 1982, to consider his project, and he would like this matter to be considered by the City Council at their meeting of January 12, 1982, in order ~ft~r him to begin construction by April 1, 1982. Mrs. Getty stated that Planning Commission would like direction from the City Council regarding these applications. Council stated they wanted input from the Planning Commission on these decisions. Council took no action at this time on the following two issues: (1) in "afford- able projects" what design criteria should be considered; and (2) what amenities should be included in affordable projects. Council then discussed what fees, if any, should be waived. Council determined that a number of fees could not be waived. They further determined that waiver of fees would be appropriate where the City is a substantial partner in a project but not for affordable projects in general. Council determined that affordable housing competition should be held. The City Attorney advised he would have the draft growth management plan ready for review at the City Council meeting of January 26, 1982, and he would take into consideration the above determinations. After discussion regarding the consideration of applications now before Council, Council determined to review Steve Tyler's Planned Unit Development at this meeting but make no decision on the exemptions until after consideration of the draft growth management plan on January 26, 1982. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS There were no City Council Committee-Reports presented at this meeting. MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC No one in the audience addressed the Chair. PUBLIC HEARINGS Application of Richard and Ursula Ultsch and Theodore Bates for prezontng and development plan approval for a 256 dwellinKuntt project on an approximately 29 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. The prope~t7 .~s currently prezoned PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Med~um Densit7 Residential District with certain conditions governing its development. The 9~ty Counc.il ma7 recommend approval of new prezoning and.the proposed develop- ment plan. gr make ~n7 other. re~gmmendations re~arding the subj.ect property con- sistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project, the Direc.tor of Planning and. qp.mmu~ity Development has determined that th~ propo~e~ project wpuld not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Stu~X is available for review at the Planning Division~ 200 Bernal ~ven~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning, staff prior to the above meeting date, or .directly to the City Council at the above noticed meeting 5. 12/22/81