My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN122281
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CCMIN122281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:02 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 11:16:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· 191 , <br /> <br />of the bond program, and at this point only had 10 million dollars committed, there- <br />fore another large project is needed in order for the City to qualify for the mortgage <br />revenue bond program. He stated staff felt it would be better if only those projects <br />financed by the bond issue are exempt from RAP. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated he felt that if an exemption were given to a project <br />under the mortgage revenue bond program and then the program failed, the project <br />should still be allowed the RAP exemption. He added he strongly favors the bond issue. <br /> <br /> After discussion, Council approved the following criteria for any project desiring <br />to be exempted from growth management controls under the mortgage revenue bond partici- <br />pation agreements: <br /> <br /> 1. That each unit within the project to be exempted be priced and sold below <br /> the maximum priced unit to be allowed in the mortgage revenue bond program <br /> (estimated to be $115,000). <br /> <br /> 2. That 50% of units participate in the mortgage revenue bond program. <br /> <br /> 3. Maximum RAP Housing and Capital Improvement fund contributions must be <br /> paid on all units not financed with ~ortgage revenue bond proceeds. <br /> <br /> 4. That the City be empowered to enforce price restrictions by specific <br /> performance or other legal measures. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated is was now in order to address the question of whether pro- <br />jects exempted under the mortgage revenue bond program should receive the same RAP <br />exemption if the program failed. Mayor Mercer and Councilmember Mohr stated they <br />felt RAP exemption should not be granted to projects if the mortgage revenue bond <br />program fails. Mayor Mercer suggested a phased program be entered into with a <br />developer for his project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Walker advised that the bond issue is dependent upon the approval of the <br />Daon project and whether they apply for 100 units under the bond issue. If they <br />get approval and proceed and are included in the feasibility study then the City <br />could get a bond rating in February. Mr. Walker stated that as soon as the City <br />gets another project with 10 million dollars then he could proceed immediately <br />with the bond program. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer suggested that exemption be granted only if the mortgage revenue <br />bond program is completed but that if the program should fail, then phasing be <br />considered for the project. <br /> <br /> Council then addressed the following questions: <br /> <br /> How many affordable housingunits should be exempted from the growth management <br />program each year? After discussion, Council determined to deal with this matter <br />on each project independently and to be flexible on the number. <br /> <br /> What percentage of total number of units in a project should be low cost? After <br />considerable discussion, Council determined a minimum of 25% to get a growth manage- <br />ment exemption, and agreed that the 100% housing authority project, soon to be pro- <br />posed, would be exempted. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer asked if Council wanted to act on applications now before them or <br />to see the growth management plan in draft form first. The City Attorney advised <br />he could have the draft growth management plan ordinance completed by January 26, <br />1982. <br /> <br /> 4. 12/22/81 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.