CCMIN122281 - Laserfiche WebLink

187 , Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item and continued to the meeting of January 26, 1982, 8:00 P.M., Fairgrounds Cafeteria, to allow Planning Commission review and recommendation on this matter. Application of CPK Associates and Walter Pan~aniban for Planned Unit Development zoning and development plan approval for a medium density residential project con- sisting of 113 single-family homes and 83 townhouses on an approximately 21 acre site located at the northwest corner of Rheem Drive and Oakland Avenue. Zonin~ . .for the property is "A" (Ag/leultural) District. The City Council ma~ consider and recommend any zoning for the property consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project~ the Director of Plannin$ and. Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Stu. d.y is available for review at the Planning Division~ 200 Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton. ~omments on this decision may be directed to either the Plannin~ staff prior to the above meettn~ dateFor d..ir.e~.tly to the City Council at the above noticed meetin~ (Contd. Open from 12-8-81) Mr. HarriS'presented his report (SR 81:435) dated December 1, 1981, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer. declared the continued public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Steve Tyler, representing TyCal, stated his project is high quality afford- able housing in the price range of $60,000-$90,000. He presented nine different designs of housing. He stated he has made a commitment to the mortgage revenue bond program. He stated the prices fall within the guidelines of HUD for low and medium income housing formula and will be a two year project. Mr. Charles Huff, representing Baldwin and Huff Associates, elaborated on the proposed project, showing slides of the house sizes and styles, elevations, and materials. He reviewed the energy saving devices and the dual ownership features. He stated these are high quality constructed houses, not factory built homes. He stated that he felt the project will benefit Pleasanton. Mr. Tyler addressed the park matter, stating that the park was originally in- tended to be dedicated to the City but the Park and Recreation Commission had re- commended this not be.done because of additional maintenance that would be required of the City. Mr. Tyler stated the park has been relocated within the project and will be maintained by the condominium homeowners association, but would be availible for use by the entire project area. He stated that four condomtnium units and two single-family units would be lost because of the park relocation, and he suggested a credit was due him for this change. Mr. Tyler requested exemption from the Plan- ning Commission conditions 34 and 35 relating to entering an assessment district for water and fire services. He stated his project would only impact about 20% relative .to conditions 36 and 37, and he requested his amount of participation be reduced on these conditions. He stated he could enter into a private agreement with another developer for off-site sanitary sewer services, therefore he requested the deletion of condition 38. Mr. Tyler stated he agreed to the other conditions. Mrs. Evelyn King, Park and Recreation Commissioner, stated she had objections to the location of the park originally because of safety, but found no objections to the new location of the park. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. 6. 12/22/81