CCMIN122281 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer, representing the Hansen property - Parcel No. 1, stated it was his understanding that on November 9, 1981, Council had deter- mined to remove all residential property from the Assessment District, and he felt Parcel 1 should be included in this residential exemption. Staff explained that all unimproved property should pay their fair share for the street improvement normally required, and in order to insure that all street improvements are com- pleted in an orderly fashion. Mr. Fairfield stated he felt it is unfair to include Parcel 1 in the Assessment District and his client is opposed to being in it. He stated they would agree to enter into an agreement for their fair share of street improvements. Mr. Vince Fletcher, Ponderosa Homes, stated it was his understanding that all residential property would be excluded from the Assessment District, and he did not want to be included in the Assessment District. Mr. Averill Mix, Attorney representing the Hartsen property, stated he concurred with Mr. Fairfield, and requested that Parcel 1 be left out of the Assessment Dis- trict, and affirmed his willingness to enter into an agreement for street improve- ments. Mr. Anthony Varni, Attorney, asked how many 2 acre or less parcels were in the Assessment District area. ~ir. Sam Zullo stated there are approximately 120 parcels of 1-2 acres included but not assessed. Mr. Varni stated that the Lee Samis pro- perty in the Stoneridge area could be required to pay the entire Assessment District improvement costs for this area if enough properties were exempt because they were less than 2 acres, which he felt. was unfair. Ms. MarilynMoorish, representing Kaiser/Permanente, stated she was not prepared to make a presentation at this meeting because of late receipt of the s~aff report, but does want to pursue further the possibility of non-profit organizations being excluded from the assessment district. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood that Parcel No. 1 be re- moved from the North Pleasanton Assessment District. The motion died for lack of a second.. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that the following parcels be deleted from the Assessment District: (1) Parcel 1 - the Hansen-Mix property (future Ponderosa Homes) on the west side of Hopyard Road north of Valley Avenue; (2) Parcel 2 - the undeveloped Morrison Homes property at the northeast corner of Santa Rita Road and Valley Avenue; and (3) Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 - the undeveloped residential parcels fronting the east side of Santa Rita Road between the Southern Pacific Railroad and the Arroyo Mocho, and that staff be in- structed to prepare agreements that will cover the normal street obligation improve- ments. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Mohr ABSENT: Councilmember Kephart Mr. Zullo stated that no property is officially in or out until after the public hearings are held. The formal boundary will probably be filed sometime in September, ~,nd that no action is required between now and that time except to circulate the petition, which will then be presented to the Council. He advised the petition will be circulated within a month. 12. 12/22/81