CCMIN112481 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, to delay a decision pending further studies by the Chamber Task Force. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Central Business District Parking Report Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 81:409) dated November 18, 1981, regarding this matter. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Council- member Kephart, that no decision be made at this time pending completion of the Chamber of Commerce Parking Study. ' The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Reroutin~ of BART Commuter Bus Routes Mr. Warnick presented his report (SR 81:412) dated November 19, 1981, regarding this matter. It was the general concensus of the Council that Pleasanton needs more service. Councilmember Mohr noted that when buses make right turns off Neal Street that contact is made with the light standards and it appears necessary to move that light. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 81-410, adding those bus stops listed in the staff report, be adopted. Council strongly urged that discussions continue with BART to provide full-time bus service to the Stoneridge area. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Discussion of City-owned parcel of land for low cost housing.projects Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 81:413) dated November 19, 1981, regarding this matter. Mr. P. Milne, 5525 San Antonio, spoke on the matter and indicated he would like some discussion to ensure that the integrity of the area is maintained. Mr. Art Dunkley, 205F Main Street, stated he supports the staff recommendations, but thought they should be more explicit to authorize negotiations with the non-profit corporation recently formed. Discussion ensued regarding the exact role ~f the non-profit corporation and Council's legal options. Councilmember Butler brought up the possibility of a long- term lease or other contractual arrangement between the City and the non-profit organization to insure that it is going in the direction that the City desires. He indicated the non-profit group was a good idea if it allows the low-cost housing project to move more quickly since it has contacts with developers. Mr. Dunkley indicated he was in favor of some kind of agreement which would provide an option for site control until approval of a plan by the City Council. 8. 11/24/81