CCMIN111081 - Laserfiche WebLink

221 Mayor Mercer stated he favored a combination of attachments 3 and 4 as prepared by the City Attorney, and felt that all units should contribute $925 per unit except for lower and affordable housing. Councilmember Mohr stated she would prefer taking the 2% figure for end-year population based on the Department of Finance. After considerable discussion, it was moved.by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, to instruct the City Attorney to prepare a draft ordinance containing the following elements: (a) Long term agreements as described in City Attorney's Attachment No. 4 of his staff report; (b) Those projects not covered by agreements would participate tn'a simplified allocation; -- (c) To qualify, builders must meet one of two.mandatory criterion of others (1) donation to capital improvement fund, or (2) construction of affordable housing; (d) Qualifying projects would be given permission to develop on a first come, first served basis; (e) Council would set annual allocation of capacity based on General Plan population benchmarks. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Ordinance No. 1006, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, an urgency ordinance exempting projects entering into agreements to participate in the mortgage revenue bond program of the City of Pleasanton from the requirements of the City's Residential Allocation Program, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Recommended Modifications to the Hillside Planned Development Ordinance (Contd. from 9-8-81) Mr. Levine presented his information report (IR 81:33) dated November 5, 1981, regarding this matter, stating that final details on this ordinance will be present~ed at the Council meeting of November 24, 1981. Matters for the Information of the Council Mr. LeviriB presented his information re~ort (IR 81:32) dated November 2, 1981, regarding Gross~an vs. ~ity of Pleasanton, stating this complaint has been forwarded to the City's insurance adjuster to file the appropriate responses. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Livermore-Pleasanton Water Reclamation Agencyt W~,tewat.~r Rec!~ma.tion Study Councilmember Butler presented his report dated November 4, 1981, regarding this matter. He stated he felt it is not financially feasible at this time to continue on this project. ll. Xl/lO/Sl