Laserfiche WebLink
485 <br /> <br />Consideration of Offer to PUrchase.City Prqperty on Peters Avenue <br /> Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 81:231) dated July 7, 1981, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart abstained from any participation on this item because of <br />Conflict of Interest. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that <br />the property be retained by the City until further consideration of an assessment <br />district for parking. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler and Mohr <br />NOES: Councilmember Wood and Mayor Mercer <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilm~her Kephart <br /> <br /> Mr. John Caroline, 4487 Pleasanton Avenue, stated that after discussion with <br />the City Attorney it was determined that Caroline and Gooch could not bid on this <br />property because of conflict of Interest. He presented a map of the area showing <br />parcels that could be developed and parcels that could not be developed; revealing <br />that out of a total of 22 sites there are only 5 possible sites to be built on. <br />He stated that Mr. Osborne, property owner on Peters Avenue, would like to see <br />Peters Avenue developed and would beinterested in developing the subject property. <br />Mr. Caroline stated he felt the property should be developed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Larry Osborne, 699 Peters Avenue, stated he is interested in the development <br />of this piece of property and urged Council to declare it surplus. <br /> <br /> Mr. Howard Neely, 448 Am~dor Court, stated that several proposals had' been pre- <br />sented to the City for use of this property and he felt a favorable project should <br />be decided upon. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mike Harris, 6111 Johnson Drive, stated that monies had already been ex- <br />pended for studies related to downtown parking and he felt it would be a mistake <br />to sell the property at this time, and that further consideration should be given <br />to a parking district. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated that the Planning Commission had concerns about down- <br />town parking and she felt they should have input regarding this matter. She stated <br />she could not support the issue until the Planning Commission had reviewed! it and <br />made a recommendation. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Mayor Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember <br />Wood, that Resolution No. 81-220, determining that the City-owned parcel of land <br />(approximately 4,580 square feet), located on the northeast intersection of Rose <br />Avenue and Peters Avenue be declared as surplus~ have the property appraised; set <br />a minimum price on the property based on the appraisal; and advertise by Public <br />Notice the fact that the parcel will be sold and invite sealed bids, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Wood,'and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Mohr <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilmember Kephart <br /> <br />Report on Proposed Annexation-Castleridge Enterprises (230 Acres West of Foothill <br />Road <br /> Mr. Warnick presented his report (SR 81:239) dated July 8, 1981, regarding <br />'this matter. <br /> <br /> 8. 7/14/81 <br /> <br /> <br />