Laserfiche WebLink
There being no further testimony, Vice Mayor Mohr declared the public hearing <br /> closed on the appeal and the negative declaration. <br /> <br /> Council and staff discussion ensued regarding various proposals to solve the <br /> potential traffic problems of ingress and egress to this site, especially as they <br /> relate to the ultimate configuration of the public access streets: Johnson Drive <br /> and Old Hopyard Road cul-de-sac. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that <br /> Resolution No. 82-212, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental <br /> study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as <br /> Cft ' <br /> outlined in the y s guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate for <br /> design review approval of an approximately 36,000 sq. ft., one hundred unit motel and <br /> related facilities on an approximately two acre site located at the southeast corner <br /> of 1-580 and Hopyard Road, be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Wood, and Vice Mayor Mohr <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Mayor Butler <br /> <br /> After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Mercer, that Resolution No. 82-213, denying the appeal and granting <br />design review approval of Z-82-40, application of Rossi. Development Company for an <br />approximately 36,000 sq. ft., one hundred unit motel and related facilities on an <br />approximately two acre site located at the southeast corner of 1-580 and Hopyard <br />Road, modifying Condition No. 4 to indicate that driveway improvements to meet the <br />needs of a possibly realigned street pattern will be required, and adding a new <br />Condition (No. 29) allowing, at the determination of the City Council, the closure <br />of direct access from the motel southbound through the Buttercup Pantry property <br />should traffic on internal driveway easements become a problem, and subject to all <br />conditions contained in the report of the Director of Planning and Community Develop- <br />ment dated May 19, 1982, to the Board, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Wood, and Vice Mayor Mohr <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Mayor Butler <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Mohr recessed the meeting at 9:15 P.M. <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Mohr reconvened the meeting at 9:25 P.M. <br /> <br />Consideration of the 1982-83 City of Pleasanton Operatin~ BudSet and Capital Improve- <br />ment ProSram <br /> Mr. Walker presented the report of the Director of Finance (SR 82:212) dated <br />June 9, 1982, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Mohr expressed concern in adopting this budget as the state budget is <br />still undecided and the City does not know how much it will be receiving in state <br />funds. Mr. Walker indicated that this budget would be approved as an interim budget <br />and once the status of the state budget is determined it can be returned to Council <br />for amendments. <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Mohr declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> No one in the audience spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Mohr declared the public hearing closed. <br /> <br /> 6. 6/22/82 <br /> <br /> <br />