CCMIN060882 - Laserfiche WebLink

111 be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Council discussion then ensued regarding formation of a citizens General Plan Review Committee. Councilmember Mercer stated he was opposed to a Valley-wide agency but would support creation of a citizens General Plan Review Committee. Councilmember Mohr suggested that the steering committee be selected by the Mayor. Mayor Butler stated he felt the steering committee should be selected by the entire Council. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, to establish a citizens General Plan Review Committee to review the industrial land uses within the City of Pleasanton, said review to be accomplished in the following manner: Council will select a steering committee of 8-12 people who will be charged with recommending to the Council the scope of work for the full committee, the method of doing it, and the time schedule; upon approval by Council, funds for necessary consultant studies would be made available; sub- committees would then be formed which would be open to anyone wishing to put in the time and effort to serve as a member of the review committee; and committee recommend- ations would then come back to Council for potential action. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None The City Council then turned to consideration of the Hacienda Business Park PUD application. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, that the Council make the findings relative to significant impacts contained in the staff report and as re- commended by the Planning Commission, noting that although all feasible changes or alterations have been made or required in the plan which mitigate or avoid potentially significant impacts, some significant impacts remain which are either unmitigatible- entirely or are within the jurisdiction of other agencies, but that the economic, social, and environmental benefits of the project outweight the remaining significant environmental impacts. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilmember Mohr stated she would like to see some high density zoning on the property, but would not oppose the project if this is not included. Councilmember Mercer disagreed, stating that as the project develops the Council can "track" the project's effects and can add residential uses later if necessary; he also noted the planned assessment district would be adversely affect by such a change. The consensus of the Council was that residential uses are inappropriate at this time. It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that design review of every parcel being developed, be considered by Planning Commission and the City Council; tentative maps and conditional use permits would be heard by the Planning Commissipn only unless appealed, as is normally the case. 15. 6/8/82