Laserfiche WebLink
367 <br /> <br />h. Adoption of Resolution No. 82-83, ordering the annexation of Annexation No. 83 <br /> (Oakes), approximately 25 acres of land located easterly of the City limits and <br /> north of the Arroyo Mocho Canal. <br /> <br /> i. Adoption of Resolution No. 82-84, ordering the annexation of Annexation No. 90 <br /> (Martin), approximately 83 acres of land easterly of the City limits on the <br /> northerly side of Crellin Road. <br /> <br />J.Adoption of Resolution No. 82-85, in support of SB 1336 and SB 500 pertaining <br /> to the rule of joint and several liability. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> Councilmember Kephart stated that with the recent Supreme Court decision regard- <br />ing the banning of sale of drug paraphernalis to minors, he felt the City should <br />initiate an ordinance to prohibit the sale of drug paraphernalia to both adults and <br />minors. He advised that Council had tried in the past to adopt such an ordinance <br />but was told that it could not pass such a law. Councilmembers concurred that an <br />ordinance should be initiated. <br /> <br /> Mr. Frank C. Brandes, Jr., 6889 Corte Sonada, stated that he had met with many <br />groups in the past regarding this subject and that the residents of Pleasanton are <br />very much in favor of such an ordinance, and that he strongly supports it. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, <br />directing the City staff to prepare an ordinance that would ban the sale of drug <br />paraphernalia and related items to both adults and minors within the city limits <br />of the City of Pleasanton, for consideration by Council at the meeting of March 23, <br />1982. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr reported on the recent public hearing by the Board of Super- <br />visors of the Moller Quarry on Foothill Road. She stated they voted in a sense of <br />the Board motion to grant the quarry a two year permit beginning ~pril 1982 through <br />September 1984. She stated that Supervisor Excell made a motion for the conditions <br />but did not specify exactly as to the conditions and that he requested a report back <br />from staff for consideration at the next meeting ohMarch 16th. Councilmember Mohr <br />asked Council what conditions they would like to see included, and that she would <br />attend the meeting on the 16th to report the position of the City relative to condi- <br />tions. She suggested that trucks be required to have spark arresters in order to <br />reduce the fire hazard. She requested a condition be attached that the quarry per- <br />mit be non-renewable at the end of the two year period; she advised that the quarry <br />permit application applied for was for twenty years but the Board of Supervisors are <br />granting a two year permit. Mayor Mercer stated he understands that the gravel pro- <br />duced will not be used in Alameda County. He stated he felt conditions should apply <br />to this project that will require them to provide certain safety appurtenances; pro- <br />vide proper and safe ingress and egress on Foothill Road beyond the shopping center - <br />provide left turn lanes and possibly widen Foothill Road; provide adequate police <br />control; provide a process for repair of broken windshields of other vehicles caused <br />by falling gravel; require trucks to be washed and some form of pump process to shake <br />off excess gravel; that the streets be swept more often than three times a week; and <br /> <br /> 2. 3/9/82 <br /> <br /> <br />