Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Tom Cunningham, 3556 Touriga Drive, stated that because of school bus pro- <br />blems in Pleasanton more children are riding bicycles on Vineyard Avenue to get to <br />their schools. He requested that the Police Department conduct safety awareness <br />seminars in the schools to instruct children regarding the correct way to ride their <br />bicycles, especially on dangerous streets such as Vineyard Avenue. Mayor Butler in- <br />structed staff to follow through on this suggestion as soon as possible. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Application of Ken Earp, et alp for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan <br />approval for an approximately 244 unit manufactured housing project for an approxi- <br />mately 29 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne <br />Way. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density <br />Residential District <br /> <br />Consider adoption of Negative Declaration <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:417) dated October 18, 1982, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on the application and the nega- <br />tive declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Frank Sieglitz, Attorney representing Mr. Earp, requested Council to approve <br />the development plan for the Quail Creek project because it has heretofore been <br />awarded the affordable housing competition status; there is a great deal of support <br />for the project including a letter from the Mobile Home Park adjacent to the proposed <br />project; there is a great need in Pleasanton for affordable housing and this project <br />represents an opportunity to fill that need; this is a fine project of which the City <br />can be proud of now and also in the future; the project is truly affordable; the pro- <br />ject has been revised to accomplish a wide variety of needs and requests required by <br />Council and staff; the project is ready to begin construction now; and State mandate <br />dictates that cities cannot discriminate against affordable housing or against manu- <br />factured housing. He cited Section 65580 of the Government Code substantuating this <br />fact. He stated it is proper and appropriate for Council to stand behind their award <br />of the affordable housing competition status for this project and to approve the <br />development plan for Quail Creek. Mr. Sieglitz refuted the objections of Mr. Ron <br />Schneider and his group in the Vintage Hills area who are opposed to the project. He <br />stated this group had opposed the project from its inception and had threatened the <br />City Council with lawsuit, referendum and recall if they stand on their decision to <br />approve this project. He stated the reasons for Mr. Schneider's disapproval of the <br />project are in public records as follows: petition sought to get disapproval because <br />the project was not "adult only"; this type of housing would create a slum condition; <br />adverse traffic impact; and density. Mr. Sieglitz stated that his client had hired <br />an engineering consultant, Louis H. Larson, Inc., to conduct a traffic survey on <br />Vineyard Avenue over the last two weeks, which reveal that this street is 62 percent <br />of capacity. He stated there are additional steps being taken to further promote the <br />free flow of traffic in this area. He stated that density is below that shown on the <br />General Plan for the property. Mr. Sieglitz submitted that Council weigh the threats <br />of recall against the many positive features this project offers and to approve the <br />project. He reviewed the configuration of the project, stating that changes had been <br />made at Council's request regarding the number of units, widening of streets, open <br />space, landscaping and sprinkler system. He stated the Planning Commission further <br />recommends the elimination of eight units and the addition of this space to the pro- <br />ject's community center. He requested that Council not approve the Planning Commis- <br />sion recommendation for the elimination of these units. He stated it is arbitrary <br />if the developer is now required to sacrifice further dimensions of the project to <br />achieve the changes suggested by the Planning Commission. He stated the project has <br />almost one acre of open space already, which is more than the Vintage Hills area has. <br />He added that the project abuts a regional park, and with this type of open space <br /> <br /> 4. 10/26/82 <br /> <br /> <br />