My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102682
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CCMIN102682
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:11 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 12:33:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
available he did not feel that the "open space" issue to be a significant impact. <br /> He stated there would not be any marked difference in traffic with 8 less units, <br /> and in the end the reduction of the eight units would have a significant impact on <br /> the price of the housing, increasing the cost more than $1,500.00 per unit. He <br /> stated this is intended to be affordable housing and to create additional financial <br /> burden is contrary to City Council goals for affordable housing and against State <br /> mandate. Mr. Sieglitz requested Council to abide by the configuration of the project <br /> which appeared acceptable to the Council at the time of award of the affordable hous- <br /> ing competition, and to approve the project as it was originally proposed. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer had several questions and comments regarding the conditions <br /> for approval, and stated that the agreement to be considered as item 13a on the agenda <br /> does not agree with the conditions. Mr. MacDonald stated the applicant~s attorney is <br /> aware of this. He stated that the planning staff has requested that the standard <br /> wording remain as it is. Mr. MacDonald advised that the CC&R's for this project, <br /> which will have to be approved by the City Attorney, will be strict and should take <br /> care of the concerns expressed by Councilmember Mercer. <br /> <br /> The following persons spoke in favor of the Quail Creek project: <br /> <br /> Mr. Gerald Case, 3819 Vineyard Avenue #7, stated he was not here to defend the <br /> project or the developer but is concerned about people and their need for affordable <br /> housing. He stated the group that are opposing this project because of its location <br /> and feel it will lower their property values should be aware that affordable housing <br /> is needed now. He urged Council to approve the project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jim Simms, 210 Leisure Drive, Morgan Hill, stated that he is a resident of a <br />similar project and is very satisfied with the excellent quality of the home and its <br />suitability to surrounding areas. He stated it takes care of the needs of people and <br />will enhance the value of the area. He stated there is a need to provide decent <br />housing and he asked for favorable consideration of this project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Renee Liesen, Morgan Hill, stated she had moved from Michigan to the housing <br />project in Morgan Hill, she found living there pleasant and accordable, and would <br />recommend approval of this type of housing to anyone. <br /> <br /> Mr. George Spiliotopoulos, 5638 San Jose Drive, stated he has been a resident of <br />Pleasanton since 1952 when the population was 2,500, and now it is 40,000. He stated <br />that in the process of this growth many decisions have been made, some popular and <br />some hard to take but that all have contributed to the success of the City. He re- <br />viewed some of the controversial changes in housing and stated that many of the same <br />arguments were heard at the time of those public hearings that are being heard to- <br />might. He cited Morrison Homes zero lot line homes, Catholic Church relocation, <br />Pleasanton Gardens and Pleasanton Greens, Valley Trails~ Pleasanton Convalescent <br />Hospital, Las Positas Garden Homes, Presbyterian Church relocation, and the Foothill <br />Road referendum. He stated these projects have all made Pleasanton a better place <br />to live. Mr. Spiliotopoulos stated that housing is unavailable in Pleasanton to <br />young people now according to a recent survey taken at the schools. He stated he <br />has checked with Pleasanton Gardens and Pleasanton Greens and that they have a wait- <br />ing list of 200 qualified applicants but no vacancies to offer these people. He con- <br />cluded by stating there is an urgent need for affordable housing in our city and he <br />requested Council to approve this project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Diane Olson, 4421 Fairlands Drive, stated that Pleasanton is long overdue <br />for affordable housing. She stated that people get the idea that affordable housing <br />is a slum area but this is not necessarily so; that most homeowners tend to maintain <br />their property in an orderly fashion. She stated that because of personal circum- <br />stances she could not afford to buy a home in Pleasanton, and she would like to do <br />so because she feels Pleasanton is a friendly and homey town. <br /> <br /> 5. 10/26/82 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.