CCMIN101282 - Laserfiche WebLink

211 would be located on the west side of the complex because it ~ill be quieter there; Mr. Rathert advised that he lives near the east side therefore would be subjected to the noisier portion of the development. Mrs. Nancy Storch, 3193 Chardonnay, urged Councilmembers who voted to award affordable housing competition status to the Quail Creek project to reconsider their position, and to stop all multiple development along Vineyard Avenue until appro- priate studies have been completed. She cited the number of multi-family dwellings now under construction or recently completed in this area, and the number of appli- cations that will be coming before Council in the near future. She stated these units will create a significant impact on the quality of life in the Vintage Hills area. She stated there is limited park space, Vineyard Avenue is narrow and there are no sidewalks for pedestrian or bicycle traffic, there is need for a fire station, and there have been no appropriate traffic and population studies done for this area. She requested Council to reconsider their approval of the Quail Creek project in the affordable housing competition. Mr. Steve Hughes, 587 Touriga Court, stated Council has established a policy of allowing 200 units in the affordable housing competition, and he felt it is discrimi- natory to approve 247 units in the Quail Creek project. He stated he was concerned about the size of the duplex units. He urged Council to reopen the contest and allow 250 units. Mr. Frank Belecky, Maderia Drive, stated he did not understand why this project was approved for affordable housing status after being turned down twice. He stated that high density leads to high crime and he is concerned that in five to ten years this will be a bad problem area. He added that Vineyard Avenue is overloaded with high density creating an adverse impact situation on Vineyard Avenue traffic. Mr. James Griffin, 3036 Chardonnay Drive, stated he is concerned about how this project will look in 10-15 years. He voiced opposition to the findings for approval listed in Resolution No. 82-334. He concluded by stating he felt that Council could find a more suitable location for this development; Mayor Butler informed the speakers that the Council vote in favor of the Quail Creek project being included in the affordable housing competition does not automati- cally approve the development plan; the plan will be considered by. the Planning Com- mission at their meeting of October 13, 1982, and by Council on October 28, 1982. After discussion, Council instructed staff to provide Mr. Schneider with all of the information he requested in his letter. PUBLIC HEARINGS Application of Pacific Telephone for development plan approval of a ".field operating center" consisting of three structures totalling approx~im~a. tely 13.~600 sq.. ft. and related facilities on an approximately 5.5 acre site located just south of 7200 Johnson Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) General Industrial District -. " Consider adoption of Negative Declaration Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:405) dated October 4, 1982, regarding this matter. Councilmember Mercer abstained from participation on this item due to Conflict of Interest. He asked the City Attorney about his speaking on the Pacific Telephone item that was reconsidered on September 14, 1982. Mr. MacDonald advised that Council- member Mercer spoke regarding informational matters only therefore did not violate any Conflict of Interest regulations. 7. 10/12/82