CCMIN101282 - Laserfiche WebLink

215 (2) Budget for General Plan Review - that the fiscal budget be amended to include $71,000 for the General Plan review as follows: Contract Employee $50,000 Office Space 2,400 City Staff 10,600 Other Related Costs 8,000 $71,000 (3) Organization of the General Plan Review Committee - that all citizens living or owning property in the planning area as shown by the Pleasanton General Plan, be allowed to participate in the review, provided they apply during the speci- fied thirty (30) day period; (4) Periodic Reports to City Council - that the Chairman of the General Plan Review Committee submit quarterly progress reports to the City Council, following ~' agreement between the Council and General Plan Review Committee on the defini- F" tion of "Balanced Community"; [] (5) That the proposal of the General Plan Steering Committee be approved provided [] that the Daon, Kaiser, and Fromm properties be removed from the special problem areas list, and that the Tracor NBA property on Pimlico and Santa Rita Road be ~ removed from the "I" list; be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Council discussion ensued regarding the Committee's concerns relative to how to monitor for compliance with already approved PUD conditions and should that be a part of the Committee's scope of work, and whether or not the Council should ask them to look at conditions of approval for consistency between earlier and later approvals. Mayor Butler stated he had problems with leaving out the scope of review to be considered by the Committee because without it the assignment might not get completed. Councilmember Brandes stated the scope of review could be evaluated at each quarterly report presentation to see if it is meeting the intent of the study requested by Council. Councilmember Mohr stated she agrees with what the Committee wants to do and feels it will fit comfortably in with the other items of the report. She stated that it needs to be determined what necessary equipment and staff will be required, and the expertise to identify the levels of concern and the time to cease continued building when it becomes a detriment to the City. Mayor Butler stated there are administrative aspects to such monitoring; the frequency it should be done and who should do it. Mayor Butler stated he felt this is a staff function. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Mayor Butler, that the following action be a~ded to Resolution No. 82-404, that the General Plan Review Committee be allowed to review existing applications for condi- tions of approval on existing projects for consistencies from project to project, and look for ways of monitoring for compliance to conditions; and that after Council review of the quarterly reports to follow the progress of the General Plan Review Committee's work, Council could make changes if it was felt the Committee was putting too much emphasis on items beyond the Council's intended study. be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None 5. 10/12/82