CCMIN101282 - Laserfiche WebLink

217 Councilmember Brandes stated he did not see any reference in any report related to a moratorium on projects that may come before the City, and that review of pro- jects by the Committee might not be compatible with City review of projects. He suggested a priority be established on the "I" list to look at specific areas of concern. Mr. Innes stated the committee did not recommend a moratorium, but had previously asked that the Steering Committee be notified of any PUD applications that will be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council. Councilmember Mohr asked if Mr. Innes' term "when deemed necessary" meant the Committee will review all approved projects for their conditions. Mr. Innes stated the reason for hiring a consultant is to bring a catalog of all PUD applications and to highlight some of the conditions of these items, for review by the Committee. He stated it is not the intent of the committee to review all conditions on all PUD's but they did want the privilege to bring any matters which they felt were sensitive to the attention of the Council if they so desired. Mr. John Stevens, Second Street, stated he supports Mr. Innes. He stated he would not like to see the scope or review narrowed as suggested in the staff report. He stated there needs to be wide citizen involvement, citizen review, and citizen input. He requested that the portion of the staff report to limit the scope of review not be approved ' Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer representing Alfred Fromm, stated that the Fromm property is listed in the special problem area category while other properties with similar circumstances were not. He requested that all properties be treated the same. He advised that Mr. Fromm has spent a considerable amount of money re- cently on improvements to his property and did not want this parcel to be considered a special problem area since the report was not clear regarding the special problems associated with this property. Mr. Fairfield requested that the Fromm property be removed from the list of special problem areas. Mr. John Ferreri, 865 Abbie Street, representing Tracor NBA, owners of 9 acres of property at Pimlico and Santa Rita Road, requested this parcel be excluded from the "I" list since it does have PUD zoning approval. Mr. Paul Ebright, 5416 Blackbird Drive, member of the Steering Committee, stated the list presented to Council represented the areas that the Committee felt should be looked at. Mayor Butler stated it was not the intent of Council for the Committee to review areas other than industrial. Mr. Ebright stated that the area of golf courses, Santa Rita Prison, and the Fairgrounds all directly or indirectly relate to industrial matters. Mr. Ebright stated he was concerned about staff's recommendation to narrow the scope of review thereby excluding citizen involvement, and he requested this re- commendation not be approved. He stated he concurred with the remainder of the report. Council discussion ensued regarding properties that should be excluded from the list of "I" category and from the special problem areas. It was moved by Councilmember..Mercer, and-seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 82-404, approving staff actions related to the General Plan Review Committee as follows: (1) Consultant or Contract Employee - that approximately $50,000 be budgeted to hire a contract employee to work with the General Plan Review Committee. The contract employee should report directly to the City Manager, but work exclusively for the General Plan Review Committee. Duties of the contract employee should include those in the job description included in the staff report. Selection of the con- tract employee should be by a three member board consisting of the Mayor, Chair- man of the Steering Committee, and Director of Planning and Community Development; 4. 10/12/82