My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091482
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CCMIN091482
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:11 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 12:28:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
131 <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated that after re-evaluating his decision at the <br /> Council meeting of August 24, 1982, relative to approval of the application of <br /> Pacific Telephone Company for design review approval of a 16,800 sq. ft. building <br /> and related facilities, subject to all conditions established by Planning Commis- <br /> sion Resolution No. 2206, one of which required the transformer to be undergrounded <br /> or moved to the rear of the building and properly screened, he would like to recon- <br /> sider the matter. He stated that with the number of buildings that are to be con- <br /> structed in the area with similar circumstances as well as the newly proposed police <br /> facility, he felt that the transformers with appropriate screening should be located <br /> where best suited for that particular building. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer explained that transformers are generally located near the <br /> street for easy access by utility companies, and that also the Fire Department needs <br /> accessibility. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer abstained from participation on this item due to Conflict <br /> F~' of Interest. <br /> <br />CO After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Mayor <br />[] Butler, to reconsider the application of Pacific Telephone Company for development <br /> plan approval of a 16,800 sq. ft. building and related facilities. <br />[] The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> ~[ AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAINED:Councilmember Mercer <br /> <br /> After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by <br /> Mayor Butler, that Resolution No. 82-350, approving the application of Pacific Tele- <br /> phone Company for development plan approval of a 16,800 sq. ft. building and related <br /> facilities on an approximately 1.6 acre site located on the west side of Willow Road <br /> approximately 600 feet north of the intersection of Stoneridge Drive and Willow Road, <br /> subject to conditions sho~ in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2206, but deleting <br /> Condition 5 which requires the transformer shown near the southeast corner of the <br /> building shall be undergrounded or moved to the rear of the building and properly <br /> screened, and rescinding Resolution No. 82-325 which formerly approved the applica- <br /> tion subject to all conditions, be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Wood, and Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: Councilmember Mohr <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAINED~Councilmember Mercer <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated that the vacant service station at the entrance of <br /> Mission Park is in desperate need of maintenance of landscaping, and is an eyesore <br /> to this area. The City Attorney advised he would investigate what action could be <br /> taken to get the problem corrected as soon as possible. <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL COmmITTEE REPORTS <br /> Councilmember Brandes advised there is legislation being considered at this time <br /> which would drast~_cally curtail local government~s voice in the cable television ser- <br /> vices provided in their community. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded <br /> by Councilmember Wood, that the Mayor be authorized to send letter of opposition to <br /> Senators Alan Cranston and S. I. Hayakawa regarding Senate Bill 2172, the cable tele- <br /> vision bill introduced by Senator Goldwater. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> 9. 9/14/82 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.