CCMIN091482 - Laserfiche WebLink

Matters for the Information of the Council Mayor Butler presented the Information Report of the Director of Public Works and Utilities (IR 82:24) dated August 30, 1982, transmitting the Minutes from the Staff Traffic Committee meeting of August 18, 1982. No action was required or taken by Council on this item. Mayor Butler presented the City Council Agenda Planning Report for the months of September, October, and November. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Bids for Traffic Signal at Santa Rita Road and ~ohr Avenu.e~ Project 82-6 Mr. Warnick presented his report (SR 82:354) dated September 9, 1982, regarding this matter. Councilmember Brandes asked if this signalization project could be included in the North Pleasanton Assessment District. Mr. ~rnick advised this could be added to the Assessment District but that it would delay completion of the project, which Council had put high on the priority list last year. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that the Traffic Signal installation at Santa Rita Road and Mohr Avenue, Project No. 82-6, be included in the North Pleasanton Assessment District. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes and Wood NOES: Councilmembers Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Butler ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 82-365, approving the plans and specifications for Traffic Signal Installation at Santa Rita Road and Mohr Avenue, Project No. 82-6, and authorization to advertise for bids, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Butler NOES: Councilmembers Brandes and Wood ABSENT: None REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Ordinance EstablishingAlternate Members of Commissions (Contd. from 8-24-82) Mr. MacDonald presented his report (SR 82:361) dated September 9, 1982, regarding this matter. Mayor Butler stated that since all Boards and Commissions are opposed to having alternate members that he could not support such an ordinance. Discussion ensued regarding alternate members on the Pleasanton Housing Authority Board as to who could represent the tenant representatives. Ms. Christine Pearson, representing the Pleasanton Housing Authority Board, stated she did not believe that tHTD would recognize alternate members on the Board who were not tenant representative alternates to represent each of the housing complexes. The City Attorney advised he would check into this matter before adoption of the ordi- nance. Ms. Pearson requested that the Housing Authority be exempted from the ordi- nance at this time until after further research with HUD to see if it would be legal. Councilmember Mercer stated he felt the ordinance is good because it will involve more citizens in the governmental process of the City, will avoid items being con- tinued because of lack of quorum, and will possibly encourage better attendance of regular commissioners. 19. 9/14/82