CCMIN102583 - Laserfiche WebLink

of Pleasanton with regard to outdoor sales as filed under Case RZ-83-6, be intro- duced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Butler advised that items 8b and 8c would be considered simultaneously. Application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the provisions of Ordinance No. 1014 relating to traffic levels of service (LOS) and off-site traffic improvements for PUD-81-22 (Stoneridge Business Center) Application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the provisions of Ordinance No. 973 relating to traffic levels of service (LOS) and off-site traffic improvements for PUD-80-16 (Meyer Business Park) Mr. Harris presented his reports (SR 83:463 and SR 83:464 respectively) dated October 17, 1983, regarding these two items. He also presented clarifying language relative to the conditions in question. Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on the two items. Mr. Bill Turpie, representing Meyer Business Park, stated he concurred with the clarifying language of the proposed amendment. Mr. Joe Burkhardt, representing Stoneridge Business Center, stated the amendment conforms to the mitigation measures agreement and he would be in favor of the change. Mr. Jack Hovingh, 4250 Muirwood Drive, stated he felt conditions on all business parks should be in conformity. He stated there is disparity relative to conditions 27, 52, 53, 87, 91, 94, 95, and 107 attached to Hacienda Business Park and the other business parks; he felt these conditions should apply to all PUD approvals. Ms. Sharrell Michelotti, 7873 Olive Court, stated she concurs with the clarifying language as presented by Mr. Harris. She stated it is important that mitigation measures begin as soon as LOS-D level is reached. Mr. Burkhardt stated he would rely on the intuition of the City to determine the overall traffic program needs that should be implemented. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed on the two items. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Mercer, that Ordinance No. 1105, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, after making the findings that the mitigating conditions for all of the business parks in the north Pleasanton area should be consistent and since LOS D is defined as being "tolerable" in the Highway Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, and that word changes proposed by staff were merely clarifying and not sub- stantial; approve the application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the provisions of Ordinance No. 1014 relating to traffic levels of service (LOS) and off-site traffic improvements for PUD-81-2 (Stoneridge Business Center) and that Condition No. 56 be amended as follows: "That development on the subject property may continue until the intersections at Foothill Road/Canyon Way, Foothill Road/Deodar Way, Foothill Road/ Stoneridge Drive, Stoneridge Drive/Sp~ingdale Avenue, Stoneridge Drive/Stoneridge Mall Road, Stoneridge Drive/I-680 southbound off-ramp and Stoneridge Drive/I-680 north- bound off-ramp are projected by traffic studies to reach Level of Service E (LOS E - 91% of capacity) as described in the Traffic Impact Analysis, Stoneridge Center Com- 6. 10/25/83