CCMIN101183 - Laserfiche WebLink

377' Councilmember Mohr expressed concern re~arding what would happen if the readop- tion of Ordinance No. 1040 were overturned by a referendum. The City Attorney ad- vised that the City has authority to impose whatever reasonable mitigation measures are reGuired as a result of building by building development. Mr. Caltahan stated the mitigation measures agreement is recorded and backs up the conditions. It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that Resolution No. 83-445, after determining that Council has read and considered the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the overall Hacienda Business Park project; that the environmental effects of the project before this Council are adequately covered by the prior Hacienda EIR, and in fact, overstate the potential impacts be- cause the full Hacienda Business Park cannot be built without a General Plan change; that this Council finds the potential cumulative environmental effects are those enumerated in the staff report but that the conditions of approval minimize these effects and any remaining effects are outweighed by the projects benefits, all as enumerated in the staff report, and attachments and testimgny given at this meeting; that based on the best estimate of the jobs/housing balance in Pleasanton given development of this project and all other approved projects, the project is con- sistent with the balanced growth policies contained in the Growth Management Element of the General Plan and is also consistent with all other policies of the General Plan, therefore approve Case Z-83-190, application of Anthony P. Meier and Carl Hol- vick Company for design review approval of two light industrial buildings, approxi- mately 30,000 sq. ft. and 22,000 sq. ft., and related facilities on an approximately 4 acre site on the south side of West Las Positas Boulevard just west of its inter- section with Stoneridge Drive, subject to all conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. R-83-33, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 83-446, after determining that Council has read and considered the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the overall Hacienda Business Park project; that the environmental effects of the project before this Council are adequately covered by the prior Hacienda EIR and, in fact, overstate the potential impacts be- cause the full Hacienda Business Park cannot be built without a General Plan change; that this Council finds the potential cumulative environmental effects are those enumerated in the staff report but that the conditions of approval minimize these effects and any remaining effects are outweighed by the projects benefits, all as enumerated in the staff report, and attachments and testimony given at this meeting; that based on the best estimate of th~ jobs/housing balance in Pleasanton given development of this project and all other approved projects, the project is consis- tent with the balanced growth policies contained in the Growth Management Element of the General Plan and is also consistent with all other policies of the General Plan, therefore approve Case Z-83-191, application of Callahan-Pentz Properties, Pleasanton, for design review approval of three research and development/light manufacturing buildings totalling approximately 123,000 sq. ft. and related facilities on an approxi- mately eight acre site located at the southwest'corner of Gibraltar Drive North and Willow Road, subject to all conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. R-83-34, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None lo/11/83