CCMIN101183 - Laserfiche WebLink

379 The following persons spoke in favor of the four applications: Ms. Diana Vitale, 1392 Vailwood Court, stated she realized the business park will bring more people to Pleasanton but it will create more jobs, decrease commute time, ~ eliminate flooding problems, and beautify the streets and roadways. She concluded by [~ stating she felt Pleasanton is fortunate to have Hacienda Business Park locate here. CD Mr. Mark Shaw, 3277 Gulfstream, stated he is pleased with the improvements and m beautification made to the street, he feels the design of the buildings is much better [] than other business parks in the bay area, and he would vote in favor of the projects. Mr. Lynn Lee, 4646 K!amath Court, stated he has lived in Pleasanton since 1960, and all of the recent changes have been for the be~ter. Mr. Don Childers, 652 Windmill Lane, stated he had moved to Pleasanton because of the changes going on. He advised that he is a traffic controller, and feels there will not be any traffic congestion because of the well-planned design of the roadway and the computerized si~nalization. Ms. Judy Mayhew, 5584 San Jose, stated she feels the majority of people in Pleasanton are in favor of the project. She stated she is a supporter of controlled and quality growth, and feels that Hacienda Business Park will be of great benefit to the community. Mr. Ben Fernandez, 2385 Sandpiper Way, stated he has lived and worked in Pleasan- ton for fifteen years and is delighted with the North Pleasanton development. He commended the City Council for their positive actions and for the controls being placed on Hacienda Business Park. Mr. Ed Kinney, 5493 Greenfield Way, former Councilmember and Mayor, stated he was familiar with the industrial planning process. He stated that a lot of work has gone on in previous years with the City Councils, Planning Commissions, various citizens committee and city staff, to bring this type of development to Pleasanton. He stated the results far exceed what was expected. He commended Council and staff for perservering in quality. The following persons spoke in opposition to the four applications: Mr. Jerry Goudreau, 5451 Corte Paloma, presented his written report dated October 11, 1983, updating his response to the draft Environmental Impact Report on the Growth Managenent Element General Plan amendment. He urged Council to go slow and to care- fully consider the incremental analysis relative to jobs, traffic, and environmental impact. Mr. Curt Altschul, President of Citizens for Balanced Growth, stated this group opposes the ten additional buildings, advising that previous correspondence already made a part of the record, outline the reasons for opposition to further buildings in the Hacienda Business Park. He stated he felt there should be a new Environmental Impact Report, and that no decision should be made by Council until after receipt of the report from the Citizens General Plan Review Committee. Mr. Joe Callahan, representing Callahan Pentz Properties, stated that thorough reports and project housing reports were attached to the staff report. He stated there were inaccuracies presented by Mr. Goudreau. He advised that the applications meet requirements of the original PUD and all regulations will be enforced by the CC&R's. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed on the four applications under consideration. 8. 10/11/83