CCMIN080983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Butler presented a letter from Jack Hovingh, 4250 Muirwood Drive, dated August 1, 1983, supporting approval of the construction of the hotel to be part of the Sheraton chain and to be located in the Hacienda Business Park. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Mayor Butler, to introduce the draft ordinance, including staff recommended conditions, with an added condition requiring the developer to contribute $50,000 at the time building permits are issued to be used for furnishings and/or equipment for relocated Fire Station No. 2, because of the added burden this project will place upon the Pleasanton Fire Department, particularly with respect to overnight guests and large numbers of people in the meeting rooms. Mr. Roger Gage, representing Prudential Insurance Company, advised that Pruden- tial is not the developer, and that he was unable to speak on behalf of the developer relative to the added condition. He requested this item be continued to the meeting of August 23, 1983, to allow Gus Enterprises time to consider the condition. After further discussion concerning the proposed added condition and possible adoption of a development impact fee for commercial/industrial projects, this item was continued to the meeting of August 23, 1983, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers. Review by the City Council of the design of an approximateA~ .~5,709 sq. ft. industrial/ office building and related facilities on an approximately three acre site located at the southwest corner of Willow Road and Stoneridge Drive. Zoning for the property is I-G (General Industrial) District Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 83:318) dated August 1, 1983, regarding this matter. Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on this item. He stated'that com- ments presented on the previous item would be considered relevant to this matter also and would be incorporated by reference into this project's record. Mr. Steve Fee, Fee and Munson, architects for this project, presented the site plan. He stated it would be an office building for a single user and would have maximum land- scaping. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that the City Council make the following findings: (1) that Council has read and considered the EIR prepared for the overall Hacienda Business Park Project; (2) that the environ- mental effects of the project are adequately covered by the prior Hacienda EIR and, in fact, overstate the potential impacts because the full Hacienda Business Park cannot be built without a General Plan change; (3) that the potential cumulative environmental effects are thoseenumerated in the draft Exhibit "B" Ofthe staff report but that the conditions of approval minimize these effects and any remaining effects are outweighed by the projects benefits, all as enumerated in the staff report, attachments, and testi- mony given at this meeting; and (4) that based on the best estimate of the jobs/housing balance in Pleasanton given development of this project and all other approved projects, the project is consistent with the balanced growth policies contained in the Growth Management Element of the General Plan and is also consistent with all other policies of the General Plan; and that the draft resolution, with the technical amendments indi- cated earlier by the Assistant City Attorney to Section 5 and Exhibit A, approving Case Z-83-138, the design of an approximately 45,709 sq. ft. industrial/office building and related facilities on an approximately three acre site located at the southwest corner 9o 8/9/83