Laserfiche WebLink
of Willow Road and Stoneridge Drive, subject to all conditions contained in Exhibit <br /> A of Staff Report 83:318 dated August 1, 1983, be adopted as Resolution No. 83-345. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmen~bers Brandes, Mohr, Woods and Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Mercer <br /> <br /> Review of the City Council of the design of two industrial/office buildings, totalling <br /> approximately 110,000 s~. ft. and related facilities on an approximately 6.6 acre site <br /> located on the south side of West Las Positas Boulevard, southeast of its intersection <br /> with Hacienda Drive in the Hacienda Busines~ Park. Zoning for the property is I-P <br /> (Industrial Park) District <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 83:321) dated August 1, 1983, regarding this <br /> matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vince Wong, architect, presented a design plan for the project, stating the <br /> structure will be of tilt-up construction. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sharrell Michelotti, representing the Transportation Subcommittee of the <br />Industrial General Plan Review Committee, stated this subcommittee had voted 17 for, <br />3 against, to request that the City Council require Prudential Insurance Company, as <br />a condition of approval of the A.T.& T. buildings, to dedicate a public easement and <br />construct a bridge over the Arroyo Mocho for the sole purpose of providing pedestrian <br />and bicycle access between West Las Positas Boulevard and the Sports Park via Harvey <br />Court. She presented a map showing the proposed recommendation. She stated this would <br />relieve congestion into and out of the Sports Park. Ms. Michelotti presented a letter <br />from Ms. Gerri Sherman, President of the Pleasanton Girls Soccer Association, dated <br />August 9, 1983, supporting the proposed access to Sports Park from West Las Positas <br />Boulevard across the Arroyo Mocho via a bicycle-pedestrian bridge, stating that such <br />access to the park would benefit those who participate in their programs as well as <br />all other sports organizations, both youth and adult. Ms. Michelotti concluded by <br />stating the Transportation Subcommittee has been working very hard, and are involved <br />in the study of transportation routes. She stated they support the staff report but <br />feel the developer should provide the bike-pedestrian bridge. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jack Swanson, representing Prudential Insurance Company and speaking on behalf <br />of Roger Gage, stated this is the first that Prudential has heard of the recommendation. <br />He stated there are some ramifications that should be considered before a decision is <br />made on this matter, such as how the bridge should be brought over the flood control <br />channel, obtaining of necessary encroachment permits from Alameda County, security <br />issue, and pedestrian safety through parking lot. He stated he would not like this <br />to be an added condition for approval of the design review application. <br /> <br /> Ms. Jacquie Oliverius, member of the Community Needs Subcommittee of the General <br />Plan Review Committee, stated this subcommittee voted unanimously at their last meet- <br />ing to support the Transportation CommitteeTs recommendation regarding public dedica- <br />tion of land and construction of a bike-pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo Mocho. <br /> <br /> Mr. Steve Hughes, 587 ToLLriga Court, stated that at the last meeting Council <br />ignored the requests and recommendations of the General Plan Review Committee. He <br />stated that tonight the Committee is again asking for support. He urged Council to <br />back them up. He also asked if personnel in the building inspection division are <br />properly qualified to inspect commercial buildings. Mr. Harris advised him that the <br />city's building inspectors are fully qualified, and in certain instances special in- <br />spectors are hired when there are unusual circumstances relative to inspection of a <br />building. <br /> <br /> 10, 8/9/83 <br /> <br /> <br />