CCMIN080983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember Mohr left her motion as originally stated. Mayor Butler withdrew his second to the motion. The motion died for lack of a second. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that the City Council make the following findings: that Council has read and considered the EIR prepared for the overall Hacienda Business Park Project; (2) that the environmental effects of the project are adequately covered by the prior Hacienda EIR and~ in fact, overstate the potential impacts because the full Hacienda Business Park cannot be built without a General Plan change; (3) that the potential cumulative environmental effects are those enumerated in the draft Exhibit "B" of the staff report but that the conditions of approval minimize these effects and any remaining effects are outweighed by the projects benefits, all as enumerated in the staff report, attachments, and testimony given at this meeting; and (4) that based on the best estimate of the jobs/housing bal- ance in Pleasanton given development of this project and all other approved projects, the project is consistent with the balanced growth policies contained in the Growth Management Element of the General Plan and is also consistent with all other policies of the General Plan; and that the draft resolution, with the technical amendments indicated earlier by the Assistant City Attorney to Section 5 and Exhibit A, approving Case Z-83-110, the design of two industrial/office buildings, totalling approximately 110,000 sq. ft. and related facilities on an approximately 6.6 acre site located on the south side of West Las Positas Boulevard, southeast of its intersection with Hacienda Drive in the Hacienda Business Park, subject to all conditions contained in Staff Report 83:321, dated August 1, 1983, be adopted as Resolution No. 83-346. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: Councilmember Mohr ABSENT: Councilmember Mercer Councilmember Mohr stated she was not opposed to the design of the buildings but felt the recommendation from the Transportation Subcommittee for a bike-pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo M6cho should be included in the project. Councilmember Brandes requested that the Transportation Subcommittee meet with the Park and Recreation Commission to review the bike-pedestrian bridge, and to make specific recommendations to the Council for further consideration relative to pedestrian and vehicular access into the Sports Park. Council concurred. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Adoption of Ordinance No. 1095, approving the application of Shelter Capital/Woodmont Companies and Sid Cottie for PUD (Planned Unit Development')-High Density Residential zoning and development plan approval of a 200 unit garden apartment project on an approximately 11 acre site located immediately south of t~e. Arroyo Mocho, approxi- mately 1500 feet east of the intersection of Santa Rita Road and the Arroyo Mocho Canal (I~t~6. 7-2~L83, 4-Ayes, 1-Absent) Mayor Butler stated that Ordinance No. 1095 was introduced on July 26, 1983, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr~ and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Ordinance No. 1095, approving the application of Shelter Capital/Woodmont Companies and Sid Cottie for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-High Density Residential zoning and development plan approval of a 200 unit garden apartment project on an approximately 11 acre site located immediately south of the Arroyo Mocho, approximately south of the Arroyo Mocho, approximately 1500 feet east of the intersection of Santa Rita Road and the Arroyo Mocho Canal, be adopted. 12. 8/9/83