Laserfiche WebLink
· -311-', <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Mercer requested the City Attorney to review the Bingo ordinance in <br />an attempt to allow more flexibility and to permit approval of one time Bingo permits <br />under certain circumstances. He asked for a report back at the next Council meeting. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> There were no City Council Committee Reports presented at this meeting. <br /> <br />MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> Mr. Bud Barlow, President of the Alisal Improvement Club, advised Council that <br />the annexation study of the Happy Valley area should be ready to present to the home- <br />owners group within the next two months. He stated the Steering Committee has been <br />meeting with the City Attorney, who has been very cooperative and knowledgeable in <br />their annexation study. <br /> <br /> Mr. George Moore, 5517 Paseo Navarro, addressed Council regarding street lights. <br />He stated he felt there was inequity in the street lighting policy, and requested that <br />all street lights be turned back on before removal of the poles by PGgE; that it would <br />be cost effective in the long run. He presented a petition, signed by 42 residents on <br />Paseo Navarro, which read as follows: <br /> <br /> STREET LIGHTS MAY BE PULLED <br /> "In view of the attached news- Pleasanton - PG&E will begin rooting up <br /> paper clipping of May 26, 1983, we 630 de-energized street lights later this <br /> ask the City of Pleasanton to turn year because the city has refused to pay <br /> on all street lights and especially for not using them, a utility official <br /> those on Paseo Navarro. said Wednesday. <br /> <br /> "This request is made for the "To my knowledge, Pleasanton is the only <br /> benefit of public safety and also city in the entire PG&E system that still <br /> to avoid expensive replacement isntt paying the charge for de-energized <br /> costs of those street lights at a street lights", said Lou Holveck, PG&E <br /> later date in the event PG&E exer- district manager. <br /> cises its privilege ot taking them <br /> out." / In 1978 with the passage of Prop. 13, <br /> ? <br /> many cities turned off some of their street <br /> lights to save money. The same year, the <br /> state Public Utilities Commission gave PG&E <br /> permission to charge cities a fee for each <br /> turned-off light so the company would re- <br /> cover its investment. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore also presented newspaper articles relative to this matter. He stated he <br />felt the City is in good financial condition and should turn on all street lights <br />that have been turned off. He added that if the City cannot afford to turn on the <br />lights, then a taxing district should be considered in order to pay for turning on <br />street lights. <br /> <br /> Ms. Susan Kester, 5967 Corte Espada, stated she is also concerned about street <br />lights. She presented a petition signed by 13 residents on Corte Espada, which read <br />as follows: <br /> <br /> "We, the residents of Corte Espada, Pleasanton, hereby petition the Pleasanton <br /> City Council to amend its policy with regard to paying for street lights in the <br /> City. The present policy of paying for some lights and choosing others to turn <br /> off, is both arbitrary and inconsistent. Furthermore, since PG&E is charging <br /> the City of Pleasanton rent on these unlighted street lamps and will remove all <br /> lights that are not paid for, the City would be remiss to allow these lights <br /> removed. Let's have a consistent and fair policy for all Pleasanton residents-- <br /> the City should pay for all the street lights." <br /> <br /> 4. 6/14/83 <br /> <br /> <br />