CCMIN020883 - Laserfiche WebLink

265 REPORTS OF THE CITY M~ANAGER Proposed Resolution Setting a Time for a Public Hearing on Annexation No. 100 (Picard) Mr. Warnick presented his report (SR 83:41) dated February 3, 1983, regarding this matter. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- member Brandes, that Resolution No. 83-54, approving Mr. Picard's request to withdraw his annexation proceeding, and instructing staff to write a letter to LAFCO explaining that the applicant, Mr. Picard, does not agree with the LAFCO decision to include Mr. Lafayette's parcel in the annexation, and that rather than forcing Mr. Lafayette into the annexation, Mr. Picard would like to withdrawhis annexation request, and allow the annexation proposal to expire after one year, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr Resolutions initiating application to LAFCO, agreeing to distribution of property taxes, and initiating prezoning for Annexation No. 102 (J. D. Quick, Amber Lane) (Contd. from 9-14-82) Mayor Butler stated this item had been continued from the City Council meeting of September 14, 1982, and that staff has recommended it now be continued until after completion of the Happy Valley study regarding annexation of the entire area. Mr. Jim Quick, applicant, requested annexation of his property at this time. He stated he had met with the homeowners association to discuss alternatives so that his property could be annexed to the City. He stated the property is bounded on two sides by the Pleasanton City limits. He stated he has a prospective buyer for the property contingent upon annexation to the City and determination of allowable lot size. He stated his original plan was to divide the parcel into 13 lots; now the plan is for 9 lots. He asked Council to make a determination on this item now; stating the Happy Valley study could require several months for completion and that could jeopardize his property deal if he had to wait that long for a decision. Councilmember Brandes asked Mr. Quick if he would be agreeable to PUD Low Density zoning with minimum 30,000 sq. ft. lots; which is no guarantee of number of lots. Mr. Quick stated he would be agreeable to this. Mr. Richard Parejo, 7450 Foothill Road, prospective buyer of the subject property, stated the deal is contingent on the fact that it gets annexation. Councilmember Brandes asked Mr. Parejo if he is agreeable to PUD Low Density zon- ing with minimum 30,000. sq. ft. lots. Mr. Parejo stated he is agreeable to this zoning. Mr. Bud Barlow, President of the Happy Valley Homeowners Association, stated he had met with Mr. Quick last week and discussed his basic proposal. He stated the entire association has not had an opportunity to review the plan and he could not speak for this group individually. He stated he is willing to talk further with Mr. Quick re- garding this matter. Mr. Barlow presented a schedule of meetings of the subcommittee of the Happy Valley Homeowners Association that is reviewing possible annexation' to the City, and stated that a final report should be ready for Council discussion by April 26th. Dr. D. Glafkides, 737 Happy Valley Road, speaking as an individual, stated he felt Mr. Quick's proposal should not be taken separate from the Happy Valley issue. He stated it is his concensus that the majority of the homeowners do not want lots of less than one acre in order to retain the rural atmosphere concept which they are trying to preserve. He stated he did not approve of Mr. Quick's plan. 9. 2/8/83