CCMIN020883 - Laserfiche WebLink

269 Ms. Sandy Shield, 7781 Redbud, stated that Mr. Cross is extremely neat and she would have no objection to him having a business in her neighborhood. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. Councilmember Brandes stated that his concerns had been relieved and that he could now concur with actions taken by the Planning Commission in approving this conditional use permit. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, an~ seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that Resolution No. 83-50, denying the appeal and approving UP-82-24, application of James Cross and Texaco, Inc., for conditional use permit approval to operate a service sta- tion, not including the sale of gasoline, at 44 Mission Drive, subject to all condi- tions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2258, after making the follow- ing findings: (1) that the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of this chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; (2) that the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (3) that the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this chapter, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilmember Mohr left the meeting at 9:25 P.M., due to illness. Application of Victor Lund, et al, for cancellation of Williamson Act Agricultural Preserve Contract 1974-15 under the provisions of California Government Code Section 51282.1. This application proposes to remove approximately fifty-three (53) acres of land from the above-noted contract located at the eastern termini of Junipero Street and San Jose Drive. A conceptual plan indicatin8 potential future subdivi- sion into sinSle family residential lots has been submitted by the landowner as part of this application. No development plan~ however~ shall be approved under this cancellation. Review of future development of the subject property shall occur at later proceedinSs in conformance with the law Consider adoption of NeSative Declaration Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 83:51) dated February 3, 1983, regarding this matter. Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Vic Lund, applicant, stated he concurred with the staff report. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. , It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that Resolution No. 83-51, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate for cancellation of Williamson Act Agricultural Preserve Contract 1974-15 under the pro- visions of California Government Code Section 51282.1, to remove approximately fifty- three (53) acres of land from the contract located at the eastern termini of Junipero Street and San Jose Drive, be adopted. 7. 2/8/83