CCMIN111384 - Laserfiche WebLink

121 and Alves, would be a logical expansion of the City boundaries, instructed staff to prepare the necessary resolutions to initiate annexation proceedings for this land, to be considered at the meeting of November 27, 1984, and directing that all affected neighboring residents be notified. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, and Wood NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None Scope of Work Vintage Hills Land Use Study Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:601) dated November 13, 1984, regarding this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, approv- ing the scope of work for the Vintage Hills land use and circulation analysis, and directing staff to prepare the study based upon that scope. The Poll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None General Plan Conformity of Proposed Pro~ect on Parcel located at Southwest Corner of Stoneridge Drive and Pleasant Hill Road Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:602) dated November 13, 1984, regarding this matter. Mr. Keith Fraser, representing the Frank Property, reviewed the proposed project, and requested Council to designate the development as commercial in order to avoid the growth management limitations. He stated the "retirement hotel" would be operated as a business; the amenities will include the main lobby, offices, central dining roomm theatre, beauty and barber shops, sundry store, and social and recreational activities area. He stated this type facility is needed in Pleasanton but that the developer can- not qualify if the growth management program has to be applied to the project. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Butler, determining that the proposed retirement community proposed for the Frank Property located at the southwest corner of Stoneridge Drive and Pleasant Hill Road, is residential in nature and that a general plan amendment cannot be permitted unless the general plan designation for the subject parcel is changed to residential. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, and Mohr NOES: Councilmember Wood and Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None Valley Memorial Hospital Board Request to be Exempt from the Three North Pleasanton Improvement Districts Mayor Mercer presented a letter from the Board of Directors for Valley Memorial Hospital dated November 12, 1984, which provided data and support necessary for their request to be exempt from the North Pleasanton improvement districts. Mr. Larry Bartelson, 675 Hamilton, Chairman of the Board of Directors for Valley Memorial Hospital, reviewed the additional information contained in the letter. He assured Council that the Board of Directors has every intention of locating an acute care facility in Pleasanton, and also to retain the present hospital in Livermore. He stated it is their belief they can do that. 9. 11/13/84