My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061284
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
CCMIN061284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:50:09 AM
Creation date
11/9/1999 11:25:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
No one inthe audience spoke in opposition to this item. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing <br />closed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that <br />Resolution No. 84-291, approving the application of Ca!lahan Pentz Properties for <br />development plan approval of an approximately 47,000 sq. ft. office building and <br />related facilities on an approximately 3.5 acre site located in the vicinity of 5669 <br />Gibraltar Drive (south) (the AT&T site), subject to all conditions contained in Staff <br />Report 84:322 dated June 6, 1984, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />The City Council declared its intent to dissolve Light and Landscape District No. <br />1'983-1 and, thus to cease levying and collecting assessments pursuant to the <br />Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500 et se~. of the Streets and <br />Highways Code) <br /> Mr. MacDonald presented the report of the Assistant City Attorney (SR 84:317) <br />dated June 7, 1984, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sharon Hal!grimson, representing Valley Business Park Owners Association, <br />stated she had reviewed the report and recommends dissolution of the district. <br /> <br /> No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing <br />closed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, <br />that Resolution No. 84-292, after hearing no protests, approve dissolution of the <br />Valley Business Park Lighting and Landscape District No. 1983-1, and directing staff <br />to bring back for Council approval at its June 26, 1984, a maintenance agreement with <br />Valley Business Park Owners' Association, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Application of Ashwill Hawkins and Partners~ Inc.~ for design approval of four office/ <br />industrial buildings totalling approximateiv 36,900 sq. ft., and related facilities <br />on an approximately 2.4 acre site at 2174 and 2183 Rheem Drive. Zoning for the pro- <br />perty is PUD (Planned Unit Deve!opment)-Industrial District <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration <br />(Contd. Omen from 5-22-84) <br /> Mr. Harris presented his reports (SR 84:320 and SR 84:269) regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative <br />declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. John Hawkins, Danvii!e, representing Ashwill Hawkins and Partners, Inc., pre- <br />sented floor plans of the proposed project showing potential uses which allow design <br />flexibility. He reviewed the parking and landscape plans. He presented a survey of <br /> <br /> 6. 6/12/84 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.