CCMIN052284 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. Councilmember Brandes stated he had asked to have this matter appealed because of several concerns of citizens in the area; namely, Hansen Avenue has been totally un- acceptable for many months, and the adverse impact of the truck hauling route through the development. Councilmember Brandes stated he felt the conditional use permit appli- cation should be denied until Hansen Avenue is completed from Valley Avenue to the exist- ing gate and including Catle Reynoso. Councilmember Wood stated he had concerns regarding completion of the soundwall. Mr. Chuck Pinkerton, representing Ponderosa Homes, stated there are two other developers involved in the completion of Hansen Avenue; that bonds have been posted for the renovation of the street, and that it will be done as soon as the project development is completed. Mr. Pinkerton stated he is upgrading the soundwall and is waiting on material to complete it. He stated he could change the haul route from Valley Avenue through the undeveloped area. Councilmember Brandes stated he has concern about the 60 ft. flagpole, and would like it removed. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that Resolution No. 84-258, approving the appeal of the City Council of a decision of the Planning Commission, and denying without prejudice the application of Ponderosa Homes (UP-84-S) for a conditional use permit to operate a model home complex, sales office and related facilities on six lots at the intersection of the proposed extensions of Hansen Drive and Paseo Santa Cruz, after making the following findings for improvements: (1) the access road to the project is located inappro- priately, and truck traffic should be brought in on the first possible turn on Valley Avenue with no construction trucks being allowed to go beyond that point; (2) Hansen Drive from Valley Avenue to the fence at the existing end of the street, plus one block of Calle Reynoso, needs to be completely restructured, (3) that the soundwalls on Valley Avenue need to be completed; and (4) that the flag pole constitutes an inappro- priate advertising display, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Butler MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Adoption of Ordinance No. 1139, approving the application of V~A...West, Inc. ~ for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-development plan approval of a 200 unit residential deve- lopment project on approximately 35 acres located on the north .side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way (Intro. 4-24-84, 4-Ayes, i-No; Contd. from 5-8-84) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 1139 was introduced on April 24, 1984, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-No, continued from the meeting of May 8, 1984, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Ordinance No. 1139, approving the application of Val West, Inc., for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-deve!opment plan approval of a 200 unit residential development project on approximately 35 acres located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sau- terne ~ay, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, and Wood NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: Councilmember Butler 14.