CCMIN021285 - Laserfiche WebLink

169 Mr. Chuck Muth, 3644 Vine Street, spoke in opposition to this project, stating it will create a significant adverse traffic impact on Vineyard Avenue, which is already at service level E without approving this application. He requested that no decision be made until after completion and review of the Vintage Hills study. He added that the lot depth should be given additional review aswell as completion of the Valley Avenue/Bernal extension before any action is taken on this matter. Mr. Frank Belecky, 892 Madeira Drive, representing the Vintage Hills Homeowners Association, stated this group opposes the proposed project. He stated they request that this project not be built until the Valley Avenue/Bernal extension is completed; and that further consideration of the matter be delayed until after review of the Vintage Hills study. He stated that it is the consensus of the Vintage Hills Home- owners Association and Mavis Drive residents that any further development in this area be limited to single-family detached homes, in order to cut down on density and traffic. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the mitigated negative declaration. Councilmember Brandes stated he concurs with the recommendation of Planning Com- mission regarding the negative declaration. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Mohr, that Resolution No. 85-72, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-84-7, application of John and Joan Caroline for development plan approval for a 19 unit detached single-family residential project proposed for the approximately 2.0 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Mavis Drive, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Wood ABSENT: None Councilmembers Butler and Wood stated they would be voting in opposition to this item because they felt it is appropriate to delay a decision until after review of the Vintage Hills study, and as requested by residents in the area. Mayor Mercer stated he supports this project as there will be an insignificant number of traffic added to Vineyard Avenue because of this development, a~d because of the great need for this price housing in the City. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1181, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-84-7, application of John and Joan Caroline for development plan approval for a 19 unit detached single-family residential pro- ject proposed for the approximately 2.0 acre site located on the north side of Vine- yard Avenue opposite Mavis Drive, subject to conditions approved by Planning Commis- sion and contained in Exhibit B in Staff Report 85:04, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmembers Butler and Wood ABSENT: None RZ-84-20, Application of the City of Pleasanton for amendment to the Ordinance Code to allow eight (8) foot high rear and side yard fences in residential districts~ and to modify the definition of "rear yards" 7. 2/12/85