Laserfiche WebLink
189 <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr asked if the $75.00 additional per month for meals would be <br />optional. Mr. Harris advised it is mandatory. Councilmember Mohr G.uestioned the <br />income range shown in the report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tim Trusdale, representing Eden Housing, elaborated on the affordability <br />issue, stating it is premature at this time to set fixed figures as it will depend <br />on many considerations including how much money; the City is willing to commit to <br />this project. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated he is concerned about the ownership structure. Mr. <br />Trusdale stated that once they start getting into the financial structure and legal <br />documentation that a three member board should be created to sign those documents. <br />The three member board would be appointed by Citv Council, following the avenues used <br />for other City ~uilding, which was the Certificate of Participation avenue. He stated <br />this did not have to be done tonight, and he did not know what process Council goes <br />through to appoint people to such a board. He stated that PHGI is laying out some <br />financial options tonight, as requested by Council in the November meeting. PHGI <br />wants Council's blessing to proceed with the Certificate of Participation avenue <br />approach to this structure and finance under that aspect. If not, then PHGI would <br />have the Bond Inducement resolution to fall back on and would proceed under the tax <br />exempt bond program. Another purpose in tonight's presentation is to lay out some <br />ownership structures; Council can use the PHGI corporate shell to end up being the <br />actual paper entity that owns the project or Council can create their own entity. <br />PHGI would like to continue to play the major role in moving this project, at least <br />through construction, then the City would have a three member board and management <br />agency taking over. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer asked if the City will go out to bid on the financing of this pre- <br />ject. Mr. Peter Ross, financial consultant, stated that it depends on which financ- <br />ing sturcture the City chooses. He advised that Council will be an active partici- <br />pant in approving the financial structure, bidding, and construction process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Walker stated the financing and structure will be much the same as that used <br />for the construction of the police building. <br /> <br /> After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded <br />by Councilmember Mohr, to approve use of the Certificate of Participation approach to <br />finance the senior housing development and authorized City staff, Pleasanton Housing <br />Group, Inc., and consultants to proceed. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mr. John Budsky, representing HUD with E. F. Hutton as underwriters, stated they <br />would like to be considered for this or any other projects that might be coming up, <br />and would llke the opportunity to present a competitive bid. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer requested that Pleasanton Housing Group, Inc., and the consultants <br />work with staff regarding the financial structure, affordability/rent levels, and <br />ownership structure, and to keep Council informed as the project progresses. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br />Actions Taken by the Board of Adjustment, Design Review Board, and Planning Commis- <br />sion at their meeting of 1-9-85 <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 85:28) dated January 14, 1985, regarding this <br />matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. <br /> <br /> 11. 1/22/85 <br /> <br /> <br />